Recent Advancements in Computational Intelligence: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications (Part 1)

A Generative Adversarial Model IGAN for Intrusion Detection Systems in the Industrial Internet of Things Environment

Author(s): D. Radha* and M. G. Kavitha

Pp: 87-115 (29)

DOI: 10.2174/9798898810337125010008

* (Excluding Mailing and Handling)

Abstract

The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has emerged as a prominent area of research, leveraging sensors, actuators, and computing capabilities to revolutionize data collection, communication, and processing. This has led to the development of innovative Industry 4.0 applications across various sectors such as mining, energy, healthcare, agriculture, and transportation. Despite its numerous benefits, security and privacy remain significant challenges in IIoT design, necessitating the integration of intrusion detection systems (IDS) for mitigation. Recent advancements in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms offer promising avenues for the development of effective IDS techniques tailored to the IIoT environment. However, the scarcity and imbalance of attack datasets pose obstacles to existing IDS models. In response, this paper proposes a deep learning-enabled privacy-preserving technique aimed at improving classification accuracy. The proposed Fused IGAN-IDS model comprises three key components: (i) Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) for generating high-quality samples to address data imbalance; (ii) An extremely randomized tree-based feature selection algorithm for identifying significant features from the dataset; and (iii) The Sparse Stacked Autoencoder (SSAE) algorithm for selecting relevant features to optimize the attack detection process's timing efficiency. By incorporating adversarial data samples into the original dataset, the fused IGANIDS model reached an accuracy of 99.6%, sensitivity of 99.5%, specificity of 99.7%, precision of 98.4%, and a Jaccard Similarity Score (JSS) of 99.7%. This approach also resulted in a lower false alarm rate, with a 4% False Positive Rate (FPR) and a 3% False Negative Rate (FNR). 


Keywords: AEDLN, BSA, Deep learning, Fused IGAN, Feature selection, GAN, IGAN, Randomized tree, Sparse stacked auto encoder.

Related Journals
Related Books
© 2026 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy