Abstract
Universities value research above teaching due to its influence on ranking tables. Many universities tend to offer high-margin programs in order to channel teaching surpluses towards funding research. Mediocre researchers are valued over inspiring teachers, who are often passed over for promotion. The existence of a research-teaching nexus is questionable when most researchers hardly teach. Despite the proliferation of research publications, groundbreaking research has actually decreased in the last few decades. There are claims that most published research is false, and that there is a crisis of credibility due to the inability to replicate many experiments.
Keywords: Australian Productivity Commission, Incentive System, P-hacking, Research-Teaching Nexus.
Related Books
Capitalist Realism in Africa: Realities and Myths in Advertising
Digital Currency: An International Legal and Regulatory Compliance Guide
Firms` Strategic Decisions: Theoretical and Empirical Findings
Firms` Strategic Decisions: Theoretical and Empirical Findings
Firms` Strategic Decisions: Theoretical and Empirical Findings
Intellectual Property Basic Manual for Researchers in Universities
.jpg)
Internet Economics: Models, Mechanisms and Management
Learning Why and How: A Reader in Managing Nonprofit and Voluntary Organizations
Markets, Business and Sustainability
Organizational Management: Case Studies for Graduate Students