Current Alzheimer Research

Current Alzheimer Research

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1567-2050
ISSN (Online): 1875-5828

Back Subscribe
Translate in Chinese
Research Article

Topological Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease from Functional Brain Network Analysis

Author(s): Soudeh Behrouzinia and Alireza Khanteymoori*

Volume 22, Issue 8, 2025

Published on: 26 August, 2025

Page: [563 - 586] Pages: 24

DOI: 10.2174/0115672050399190250815070642

Price: $65

Become a Editorial Board Member
Become a Reviewer
Become a Editor
Become a Section Editor

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative condition characterized by the gradual deterioration of cognitive functions. Early identification of functional brain changes is crucial for timely diagnosis and effective intervention. This study employs multiplex network analysis to examine alterations in brain connectivity topology associated with Alzheimer's Disease, to identify early biomarkers and uncover potential therapeutic targets.

Methods: This study presents a secondary cross-sectional analysis based on a publicly available EEG dataset comprising spectral coherence measurements from 25 patients with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and 25 age- and gender-matched Healthy Controls (HC). Functional connectivity matrices were generated across seven distinct frequency bands, with each brain region modeled as a network node and inter-regional coherence values represented as weighted edges. These matrices were then used to construct multiplex brain networks, which were rigorously analyzed using graph-theoretical approaches. The analysis encompassed key metrics, including modularity, centrality measures (Betweenness and MultiRank), motif distribution, and network controllability, to characterize and compare the underlying patterns of functional brain organization in AD and healthy aging.

Results: Networks associated with AD exhibited significantly reduced modularity, disrupted centrality patterns, and a higher occurrence of 2 and 3-node motifs, indicating local reorganization of connectivity. Additionally, the spatial distribution of driver nodes was markedly altered in AD. Centrality analyses revealed a pronounced shift in network hubs toward the temporal and insular cortices, suggesting compensatory or pathological reallocation of influence. Controllability assessments demonstrated a lower energy requirement for network control in AD, accompanied by increased inter-layer fragmentation, reflecting compromised integrative function across frequency bands.

Discussion: The findings revealed specific topological alterations, including reduced modularity, altered centrality, and decreased controllability, all of which are closely linked to AD-related network degeneration. By leveraging multi-frequency EEG data, the multiplex approach shows significant clinical potential for monitoring disease progression and supporting personalized treatments, with the ability to detect subtle connectivity disruptions before cognitive symptoms manifest.

Conclusion: Multiplex network analysis reveals distinct and robust alterations in the functional brain architecture of individuals with Alzheimer’s Disease. These network-level disruptions offer valuable insights into the pathophysiology of AD and highlight potential avenues for early diagnosis and targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving cognitive function.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, brain networks, complex networks, multiplex networks, controllability, neurodegeneration.

[1]
Jauny G, Mijalkov M, Canal-Garcia A, et al. Linking structural and functional changes during aging using multilayer brain network analysis. Commun Biol 2024; 7(1): 239.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-05927-x] [PMID: 38418523]
[2]
Zheng X, Wang B, Liu H, et al. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease via resting-state EEG: Integration of spectrum, complexity, and synchronization signal features. Front Aging Neurosci 2023; 15: 1288295.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1288295] [PMID: 38020761]
[3]
Chetty CA, Bhardwaj H, Kumar GP, et al. EEG biomarkers in Alzheimer’s and prodromal Alzheimer’s: A comprehensive analysis of spectral and connectivity features. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024; 16(1): 236.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01582-w] [PMID: 39449097]
[4]
Cao J, Li B, Li X. Identification of Alzheimer’s disease brain networks based on EEG phase synchronization. Biomed Eng Online 2025; 24(1): 32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-025-01361-0] [PMID: 40059173]
[5]
Gwon D, Won K, Song M, Nam CS, Jun SC, Ahn M. Review of public motor imagery and execution datasets in brain-computer interfaces. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17: 1134869.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1134869] [PMID: 37063105]
[6]
Prakash RS, McKenna MR, Gbadeyan O, et al. A whole‐brain functional connectivity model of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Alzheimers Dement 2025; 21(1): 14349.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.14349] [PMID: 39711458]
[7]
Chang C, Chen JE. Multimodal EEG-fMRI: Advancing insight into large-scale human brain dynamics. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2021; 18: 100279.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2021.100279] [PMID: 34095643]
[8]
Boucher S, Arribarat G, Cartiaux B, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging tractography of white matter tracts in the equine brain. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 382.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00382] [PMID: 32850994]
[9]
Lama RK, Kwon GR. Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using brain network. Front Neurosci 2021; 15: 605115.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.605115] [PMID: 33613178]
[10]
Fathian A, Jamali Y, Raoufy MR, et al. The trend of disruption in the functional brain network topology of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep 2022; 12(1): 14998.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18987-y] [PMID: 36056059]
[11]
Pineda AM, Ramos FM, Betting LE, Campanharo AS. Use of complex networks for the automatic detection and the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Advances in Computational Intelligence: 15th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, IWANN 2019. Gran Canaria, Spain, 2019, vol. 11506, pp. 115-126.
[12]
Mohammadian F, Noroozian M, Sadeghi AZ, et al. Effective connectivity evaluation of resting-state brain networks in Alzheimer’s disease, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging: An exploratory study. Brain Sci 2023; 13(2): 265.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020265] [PMID: 36831808]
[13]
Wang L, Sheng J, Zhang Q, et al. Functional brain network measures for Alzheimer’s disease classification. IEEE Access 2023; 11: 111832-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3323250]
[14]
Pluta R. A look at the etiology of Alzheimer’s Disease based on the brain ischemia model. Curr Alzheimer Res 2024; 21(3): 166-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0115672050320921240627050736] [PMID: 38963100]
[15]
Wang J, Zhao J, Chen X, Yin B, Li X, Xie P. Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis using rhythmic power changes and phase differences: A low-density EEG study. Front Aging Neurosci 2025; 16: 1485132.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1485132] [PMID: 39897456]
[16]
Bassett DS, Sporns O. Network neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 2017; 20(3): 353-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.4502] [PMID: 28230844]
[17]
Bassett DS, Zurn P, Gold JI. On the nature and use of models in network neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2018; 19(9): 566-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0038-8] [PMID: 30002509]
[18]
Wang D. EEG and brain network analysis in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. TNS 2024; 58(1): 60-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/58/20241336]
[19]
Vaiana M, Muldoon SF. Multilayer brain networks. J Nonlinear Sci 2020; 30(5): 2147-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00332-017-9436-8]
[20]
Stelzer GT, Lima-Filho RAS. Amyloid-β as a key player in cerebrovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 2024; 44(27): 0663242024.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0663-24.2024] [PMID: 38960709]
[21]
Amoroso N, La Rocca M, Bruno S, et al. Multiplex networks for early diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2018; 10: 365.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00365] [PMID: 30487745]
[22]
Guillon J. Multilayer approach to brain connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Doctoral dissertation, Sorbonne Université 2018.
[23]
Bianconi G. Multilayer Networks: Structure and Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198753919.001.0001]
[24]
Gu S, Pasqualetti F, Cieslak M, et al. Controllability of structural brain networks. Nat Commun 2015; 6(1): 8414.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9414] [PMID: 26423222]
[25]
Filippi M, Spinelli EG, Cividini C, Ghirelli A, Basaia S, Agosta F. The human functional connectome in neurodegenerative diseases: Relationship to pathology and clinical progression. Expert Rev Neurother 2023; 23(1): 59-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2023.2174016] [PMID: 36710600]
[26]
Liu Y-Y, Slotine J-J, Barab’asi A-L. Controllability of complex networks. Nature 2011; 473: 167-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10011]
[27]
Yuan Z, Zhao C, Di Z, Wang WX, Lai YC. Exact controllability of complex networks. Nat Commun 2013; 4(1): 2447.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3447] [PMID: 24025746]
[28]
Tang E, Bassett DS. Colloquium: Control of dynamics in brain networks. Rev Mod Phys 2018; 90(3): 031003.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.031003]
[29]
Wu L, Li M, Wang JX, Wu FX. Controllability and its applications to biological networks. J Comput Sci Technol 2019; 34(1): 16-34.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11390-019-1896-x]
[30]
Tahmassebi A, Meyer-B¨ase U, Meyer-B¨ase A. Modeling disease spreading process induced by disease agent mobility in dementia networks.Pattern Recognition and Tracking XXXI. SPIE 2020; 11400: 30-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2557814]
[31]
Tahmassebi A, Meyer-Baese U, Meyer-Baese A. Structural target controllability of brain networks in Dementia. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2021; 2021: 3978-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630496] [PMID: 34892102]
[32]
Van Popering L, Tahmassebi A, Meyer-Baese U, et al. Identifying the diffusion source of dementia spreading in structural brain networks. Medical Imaging 2021. Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging 2021; Vol. 11600: 58-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2582200]
[33]
McGowan AL, Parkes L, He X, et al. Controllability of structural brain networks and the waxing and waning of negative affect in daily life. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci 2022; 2(4): 432-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.11.008] [PMID: 36324655]
[34]
García-Planas M, García-Camba M. Controllability of brain neural networks in learning disorders, a geometric approach. Mathematics 2022; 10(3): 331.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math10030331]
[35]
Battiston F, Nicosia V, Latora V. Structural measures for multiplex networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2014; 89(3): 032804.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.032804] [PMID: 24730896]
[36]
Guillon J, Attal Y, Colliot O, et al. Loss of brain inter-frequency hubs in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 10879.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07846-w] [PMID: 28883408]
[37]
Ihmels J, Friedlander G, Bergmann S, Sarig O, Ziv Y, Barkai N. Revealing modular organization in the yeast transcriptional network. Nat Genet 2002; 31(4): 370-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng941] [PMID: 12134151]
[38]
Newman MEJ. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103(23): 8577-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103] [PMID: 16723398]
[39]
Wagner GP, Pavlicev M, Cheverud JM. The road to modularity. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8(12): 921-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2267] [PMID: 18007649]
[40]
Chen ZJ, He Y, Rosa-Neto P, Germann J, Evans AC. Revealing modular architecture of human brain structural networks by using cortical thickness from MRI. Cereb Cortex 2008; 18(10): 2374-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn003] [PMID: 18267952]
[41]
Bassett DS, Greenfield DL, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR, Moore SW, Bullmore ET. Efficient physical embedding of topologically complex information processing networks in brains and computer circuits. PLOS Comput Biol 2010; 6(4): 1000748.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000748] [PMID: 20421990]
[42]
Meunier D, Lambiotte R, Bullmore ET. Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks. Front Neurosci 2010; 4: 200.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00200] [PMID: 21151783]
[43]
Oldham MC, Konopka G, Iwamoto K, et al. Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain. Nat Neurosci 2008; 11(11): 1271-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2207] [PMID: 18849986]
[44]
Crossley NA, Mechelli A, Vértes PE, et al. Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110(28): 11583-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220826110] [PMID: 23798414]
[45]
Fukushima M, Betzel RF, He Y, et al. Fluctuations between highand low-modularity topology in time-resolved functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2018; 180(Pt B): 406-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.044] [PMID: 28823827]
[46]
Freeman LC. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1978; 1(3): 215-39.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7]
[47]
Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 2010; 52(3): 1059-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003] [PMID: 19819337]
[48]
Stam CJ, de Haan W, Daffertshofer A, et al. Graph theoretical analysis of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2009; 132(1): 213-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn262] [PMID: 18952674]
[49]
Taguas I, Doval S, Maestú F, López-Sanz D. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of network centrality disruption in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A MEG multilayer approach. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024; 16(1): 216.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01576-8] [PMID: 39385281]
[50]
Daianu M, Jahanshad N, Nir T, et al. Disrupted rich club network in alzheimer’s disease: A structural connectome study. Brain Struct Funct 2015; 220(2): 1051-66.
[PMID: 24442866]
[51]
Rahmede C, Iacovacci J, Arenas A, Bianconi G. Centralities of nodes and influences of layers in large multiplex networks. J Complex Netw 2018; 6(5): 733-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnx050]
[52]
Aerts H, Fias W, Caeyenberghs K, Marinazzo D. Brain networks under attack: Robustness properties and the impact of lesions. Brain 2016; 139(Pt 12): 3063-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww194]
[53]
Fu L, Liu L, Zhang J, Xu B, Fan Y, Tian J. Brain network alterations in Alzheimer’s disease identified by early-phase PIB-PET. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2018; 2018(1): 1-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6830105] [PMID: 29531506]
[54]
Gracia-Tabuenca Z, Moreno MF, Barrios FA, Alcauter S. Distinct network topology in Alzheimer’s Disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2018; 141(5): 1466-81.
[55]
De Domenico M. Multilayer modeling and analysis of human brain networks. Gigascience 2017; 6(5): 1-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix004] [PMID: 28327916]
[56]
Stella M, Citraro S, Rossetti G, Marinazzo D, Kenett YN, Vitevitch MS. Cognitive modelling with multilayer networks: Insights, advancements and future challenges. arXiv Preprint 2022.
[57]
Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang D. Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Phys Rep 2006; 424(4-5): 175-308.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009]
[58]
Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, Alon U. Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 2002; 298(5594): 824-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5594.824] [PMID: 12399590]
[59]
Sporns O, Kötter R. Motifs in brain networks. PLoS Biol 2004; 2(11): 369.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020369] [PMID: 15510229]
[60]
Stam CJ. Modern network science of neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 2014; 15(10): 683-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn3801] [PMID: 25186238]
[61]
Alizadeh S, Pósfai M, Ghasemi A. Input node placement restricting the longest control chain in controllability of complex networks. Sci Rep 2023; 13(1): 3752.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30810-w] [PMID: 36882620]
[62]
Chen YZ, Wang LZ, Wang WX, Lai YC. Energy scaling and reduction in controlling complex networks. R Soc Open Sci 2016; 3(4): 160064.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160064] [PMID: 27152220]
[63]
Klickstein I, Sorrentino F. Control distance and energy scaling of complex networks. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng 2020; 7(2): 726-36.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2018.2887042]
[64]
Srivastava P, Nozari E, Kim JZ, et al. Models of communication and control for brain networks: Distinctions, convergence, and future outlook. Netw Neurosci 2020; 4(4): 1122-59.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00158] [PMID: 33195951]
[65]
Müller PC, Weber HI. Analysis and optimization of certain qualities of controllability and observability for linear dynamical systems. Automatica 1972; 8(3): 237-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(72)90044-1]
[66]
Alizadeh DSS, Fornito A, Ghasemi A. The impact of input node placement in the controllability of structural brain networks. Sci Rep 2024; 14(1): 6902.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57181-0] [PMID: 38519624]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite