Current Alzheimer Research

Current Alzheimer Research

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1567-2050
ISSN (Online): 1875-5828

Back Subscribe
Translate in Chinese
Mini-Review Article

Integration of Neuroimaging and Molecular Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia: The Promise of fMRI

Author(s): Joanna Poszwa, Bartosz Słowikowski, Wojciech Owecki, Oliwia Szymanowicz, Pawel P. Jagodzinski, Wojciech Kozubski and Jolanta Dorszewska*

Volume 22, Issue 7, 2025

Published on: 31 July, 2025

Page: [477 - 487] Pages: 11

DOI: 10.2174/0115672050390340250716061313

Price: $65

Become a Editorial Board Member
Become a Reviewer
Become a Editor
Become a Section Editor

Abstract

Introduction: Dementia is a set of acquired and progressive neuropsychiatric disorders. The most common types of dementia include Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD). Early intravital diagnosis of both types of dementia is difficult. Both molecular and neuroimaging markers are important for the diagnosis of different types of dementia.

Methods: This review employed freely accessible databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect, using keywords such as molecular parameters, neuroimaging factors, dementia, FTD, Alzheimer’s disease, and fMRI.

Results: Among the molecular markers of dementia, there are parameters common to its various types and enabling their differentiation. These parameters include both genetic and biochemical factors. Markers include genetic factors that help differentiate AD (APP, PSEN1, PSEN2) from FTD (e.g., TARDBP, FUS, MAPT). Simultaneously, there are important biochemical parameters differentiating AD (amyloid-beta (Aβ), neurofibrillary tangles) from FTD (TDP-43, FUS, and different forms of tau protein aggregates). Currently, there is growing interest in neuroimaging studies in the differential diagnosis of dementia. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging enables the quantification and localization of Aβ deposits in the brain through the selective binding of the Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) ligand. This method has become the standard in AD diagnostics. In the context of magnetic resonance imaging studies, it is worth noting the search for structural differences between AD (mainly affecting the temporal lobe, including the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, and the parietal lobe) and FTD (primarily involving the prefrontal cortex, anterior temporal lobes, and subcortical structures, as well as exhibiting an anteroposterior gradient of atrophy). However, the method of the future appears to be functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), especially since functional changes precede structural changes in the development of dementia.

Discussion: The review encompasses the basic diagnostic criteria for AD and FTD dementia, as well as molecular and neuroimaging parameters important for the intravital diagnosis of these dementias. It seems that the use of fMRI can contribute to both early diagnosis and early introduction of targeted treatment in developing dementia. Although it is not yet widely used clinically, its diagnostic value is increasingly recognized.

Conclusion: The benefits of fMRI studies complementing molecular markers in the diagnosis of dementia were highlighted.

Keywords: Molecular parameters, neuroimaging factors, dementia, FTD, Alzheimer’s disease, fMRI. *

Next »
[1]
Villemagne VL, Barkhof F, Garibotto V, Landau SM, Nordberg A, van Berckel BNM. Molecular imaging approaches in dementia. Radiology 2021; 298(3): 517-30.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200028] [PMID: 33464184]
[2]
Villa C, Lavitrano M, Salvatore E, Combi R. Molecular and imaging biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: A focus on recent insights. J Pers Med 2020; 10(3): 61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm10030061] [PMID: 32664352]
[3]
Huang Y, Mucke L. Alzheimer mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Cell 2012; 148(6): 1204-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.040] [PMID: 22424230]
[4]
Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Neurology 2016; 87(5): 539-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002923] [PMID: 27371494]
[5]
Bang J, Spina S, Miller BL. Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet 2015; 386(10004): 1672-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00461-4] [PMID: 26595641]
[6]
Boeve BF, Boxer AL, Kumfor F, Pijnenburg Y, Rohrer JD. Advances and controversies in frontotemporal dementia: Diagnosis, biomarkers, and therapeutic considerations. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21(3): 258-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00341-0] [PMID: 35182511]
[7]
Khan S, Barve KH, Kumar MS. Recent advancements in pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neuropharmacol 2020; 18(11): 1106-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X18666200528142429] [PMID: 32484110]
[8]
Ray NR, Ayodele T, Jean-Francois M, et al. The early-onset Alzheimer’s disease whole-genome sequencing project: Study design and methodology. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19(9): 4187-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.13370] [PMID: 37390458]
[9]
Zhang NK, Zhang SK, Zhang LI, Tao HW, Zhang GW. The neural basis of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2024; 16: 1487875.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1487875] [PMID: 39703925]
[10]
Ismail Z, Creese B, Aarsland D, et al. Psychosis in Alzheimer disease — mechanisms, genetics and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Neurol 2022; 18(3): 131-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00597-3] [PMID: 34983978]
[11]
Angelucci F, Spalletta G, Iulio F, et al. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients are characterized by increased BDNF serum levels. Curr Alzheimer Res 2010; 7(1): 15-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156720510790274473] [PMID: 20205668]
[12]
Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2021; 397(10284): 1577-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32205-4] [PMID: 33667416]
[13]
Słowikowski B, Owecki W, Jeske J, et al. Epigenetics and the neurodegenerative process. Epigenomics 2024; 16(7): 473-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/epi-2023-0416] [PMID: 38511224]
[14]
Liu E, Zhang Y, Wang JZ. Updates in Alzheimer’s disease: From basic research to diagnosis and therapies. Transl Neurodegener 2024; 13(1): 45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40035-024-00432-x] [PMID: 39232848]
[15]
Ulugut H, Pijnenburg YAL. Frontotemporal dementia: Past, present, and future. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19(11): 5253-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.13363] [PMID: 37379561]
[16]
Miller B, Llibre Guerra JJ. Frontotemporal dementia. Handb Clin Neurol 2019; 165: 33-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64012-3.00003-4] [PMID: 31727221]
[17]
Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011; 134(9): 2456-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr179] [PMID: 21810890]
[18]
Antonioni A, Raho EM, Lopriore P, et al. Frontotemporal dementia, where do we stand? A narrative review. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24(14): 11732.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411732] [PMID: 37511491]
[19]
Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011; 76(11): 1006-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6] [PMID: 21325651]
[20]
Yu Q, Mai Y, Ruan Y, et al. An MRI-based strategy for differentiation of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021; 13(1): 23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00757-5] [PMID: 33436059]
[21]
Chouliaras L, Thomas A, Malpetti M, et al. Differential levels of plasma biomarkers of neurodegeneration in Lewy body dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia and progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93(6): 651-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-327788] [PMID: 35078917]
[22]
Nacmias B, Piaceri I, Bagnoli S, Tedde A, Piacentini S, Sorbi S. Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Curr Mol Med 2014; 14(8): 993-1000.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1566524014666141010152143] [PMID: 25323872]
[23]
Bekris LM, Yu CE, Bird TD, Tsuang DW. Genetics of Alzheimer disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2010; 23(4): 213-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891988710383571] [PMID: 21045163]
[24]
Pires M, Rego AC. Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis-mitochondrial deregulation and targeted therapeutic strategies. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24(1): 778.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010778] [PMID: 36614219]
[25]
Rahman A, Jackson H, Hristov H, et al. Sex and gender driven modifiers of Alzheimer’s: The role for estrogenic control across age, race, medical, and lifestyle risks. Front Aging Neurosci 2019; 11: 315.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00315] [PMID: 31803046]
[26]
Park CH, Lee H, Lee YM, et al. Sex-specific effects of apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype on longitudinal hippocampal atrophy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment over a 2-year evaluation period. J Alzheimers Dis 2025; 103(4): 1269-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13872877241313066] [PMID: 39924830]
[27]
Goedert M, Ghetti B, Spillantini MG. Frontotemporal dementia: Implications for understanding Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012; 2(2): a006254.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a006254] [PMID: 22355793]
[28]
Root J, Merino P, Nuckols A, Johnson M, Kukar T. Lysosome dysfunction as a cause of neurodegenerative diseases: Lessons from frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis 2021; 154: 105360.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105360] [PMID: 33812000]
[29]
Barber RC. The genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Scientifica 2012; 2012: 1-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/246210] [PMID: 24278680]
[30]
Liu CC, Kanekiyo T, Xu H, Bu G, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: Risk, mechanisms and therapy. Nat Rev Neurol 2013; 9(2): 106-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.263] [PMID: 23296339]
[31]
Strang KH, Golde TE, Giasson BI. MAPT mutations, tauopathy, and mechanisms of neurodegeneration. Lab Invest 2019; 99(7): 912-28.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41374-019-0197-x] [PMID: 30742061]
[32]
Kao AW, McKay A, Singh PP, Brunet A, Huang EJ. Progranulin, lysosomal regulation and neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2017; 18(6): 325-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.36] [PMID: 28435163]
[33]
Hill SM, Wrobel L, Ashkenazi A, et al. VCP/p97 regulates Beclin-1-dependent autophagy initiation. Nat Chem Biol 2021; 17(4): 448-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41589-020-00726-x] [PMID: 33510452]
[34]
Benussi A, Padovani A, Borroni B. Phenotypic heterogeneity of monogenic frontotemporal dementia. Front Aging Neurosci 2015; 7: 171.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00171] [PMID: 26388768]
[35]
McEachin ZT, Parameswaran J, Raj N, Bassell GJ, Jiang J. RNA-mediated toxicity in C9orf72 ALS and FTD. Neurobiol Dis 2020; 145: 105055.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105055] [PMID: 32829028]
[36]
Grobler C, van Tongeren M, Gettemans J, Kell DB, Pretorius E. Alzheimer’s disease: A systems view provides a unifying explanation of its development. J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 91(1): 43-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220720] [PMID: 36442193]
[37]
Gibbons L, Rollinson S, Thompson JC, et al. Plasma levels of progranulin and interleukin-6 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurobiol Aging 2015; 36(3): 1603.e1-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.10.023] [PMID: 25435337]
[38]
Forgrave LM, Ma M, Best JR, DeMarco ML. The diagnostic performance of neurofilament light chain in CSF and blood for Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement 2019; 11(1): 730-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2019.08.009] [PMID: 31909174]
[39]
Gómez-Tortosa E, Agüero-Rabes P, Ruiz-González A, et al. Plasma biomarkers in the distinction of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26(3): 1231.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031231] [PMID: 39940998]
[40]
Kozubski W, Ong K, Waleszczyk W, Zabel M, Dorszewska J. Molecular factors mediating neural cell plasticity changes in dementia brain diseases. Neural Plast 2021; 2021: 1-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8834645] [PMID: 33854544]
[41]
Li LM, Che P, Liu D, et al. Diagnostic and discriminative accuracy of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 for symptomatic Alzheimerʼs disease in a Chinese cohort. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2025; 12(5): 100092.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100092] [PMID: 39948000]
[42]
Visser PJ, Reus LM, Gobom J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid tau levels are associated with abnormal neuronal plasticity markers in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 2022; 17(1): 27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13024-022-00521-3] [PMID: 35346299]
[43]
Abu-Rumeileh S, Mometto N, Bartoletti-Stella A, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in patients with frontotemporal dementia spectrum: A single-center study. J Alzheimers Dis 2018; 66(2): 551-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180409] [PMID: 30320576]
[44]
Foiani MS, Woollacott IOC, Heller C, et al. Plasma tau is increased in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018; 89(8): 804-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-317260] [PMID: 29440230]
[45]
Dorszewska J, Lahiri DK. Diversity of molecular factors in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2020; 17(3): 205-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/156720501703200518081524] [PMID: 32442077]
[46]
Szymanowicz O, Pawlak S, Potocka E, Goutor U, Kozubski W, Dorszewska J. Molecular basis of dementia. J Multiscale Neurosci 2024; 3(1): 53-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.56280/1605703412]
[47]
Palmqvist S, Tideman P, Mattsson-Carlgren N, et al. Blood biomarkers to detect Alzheimer disease in primary care and secondary care. JAMA 2024; 332(15): 1245-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.13855] [PMID: 39068545]
[48]
Piekut T, Hurła M, Banaszek N, et al. Infectious agents and Alzheimer’s disease. J Integr Neurosci 2022; 21(2): 73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.31083/j.jin2102073] [PMID: 35364661]
[49]
Dorszewska J, Hurła M, Banaszek N, Kobylarek D, Piekut T, Kozubski W. From infection to inoculation: Expanding the microbial hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2023; 19(13): 849-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1567205020666230202155404] [PMID: 36740797]
[50]
Janelidze S, Zetterberg H, Mattsson N, et al. CSF A β 42/A β 40 and A β 42/A β 38 ratios: Better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2016; 3(3): 154-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.274] [PMID: 27042676]
[51]
Khalafi M, Dartora WJ, McIntire LBJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of phosphorylated tau217 in detecting Alzheimer’s disease pathology among cognitively impaired and unimpaired: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement 2025; 21(2): e14458.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.14458] [PMID: 39711334]
[52]
Liampas I, Kyriakoulopoulou P, Karakoida V, et al. Blood-based biomarkers in frontotemporal dementia: A narrative review. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25(21): 11838.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms252111838] [PMID: 39519389]
[53]
Forlenza OV, Radanovic M, Talib LL, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: Diagnostic accuracy and prediction of dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 1(4): 455-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2015.09.003] [PMID: 27239524]
[54]
Vijverberg EGB, Dols A, Krudop WA, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker examination as a tool to discriminate behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric disorders. Alzheimers Dement 2017; 7(1): 99-106.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2017.01.009] [PMID: 28337476]
[55]
Rabinovici G, Lehmann M, Rosen H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of amyloid and FDG PET in pathologically-confirmed dementia (S8.005). Neurology 2014; 82(10_supplement): S8.005.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.82.10_supplement.S8.005]
[56]
Lesman-Segev OH, La Joie R, Iaccarino L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of amyloid versus 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in autopsy-confirmed dementia. Ann Neurol 2021; 89(2): 389-401.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25968] [PMID: 33219525]
[57]
Ward J, Ly M, Raji CA. Brain PET Imaging. PET Clin 2023; 18(1): 123-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2022.09.010] [PMID: 36442960]
[58]
Mendez MF, Shapira JS, McMurtray A, Licht E, Miller BL. Accuracy of the clinical evaluation for frontotemporal dementia. Arch Neurol 2007; 64(6): 830-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneur.64.6.830] [PMID: 17562930]
[59]
Alarjani MS, Almarri BA. Brain functional connectivity analysis of fMRI-based Alzheimer’s disease data. Front Med 2025; 12: 1540297.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1540297] [PMID: 40046917]
[60]
Ibrahim B, Suppiah S, Ibrahim N, et al. Diagnostic power of resting-state fMRI for detection of network connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42(9): 2941-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25369] [PMID: 33942449]
[61]
Cohen AD, Klunk WE. Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease using PiB and FDG PET. Neurobiol Dis 2014; 72(Pt A): 117-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.05.001] [PMID: 24825318]
[62]
Shen C, Wang Z, Chen H, et al. Identifying mild Alzheimer’s disease with first 30-Min 11C-PiB PET Scan. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 14: 785495.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.785495] [PMID: 35450057]
[63]
Rabinovici G, Lehmann M, Rosen H, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of amyloid and FDG PET in pathologically-confirmed dementia (S8.005). Neurology 2014; 82(10_supplement): S8.005.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.82.10_supplement.S8.005]
[64]
Fleisher AS, Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD Sr, et al. A16 study investigators. Positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]flortaucipir and postmortem assessment of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77(7): 829-39.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0528] [PMID: 32338734]
[65]
Tian M, Civelek AC, Carrio I, et al. International consensus on the use of tau PET imaging agent 18F-flortaucipir in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49(3): 895-904.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05673-w] [PMID: 34978595]
[66]
Tsai RM, Bejanin A, Lesman-Segev O, et al. 18F-flortaucipir (AV-1451) tau PET in frontotemporal dementia syndromes. Alzheimers Res Ther 2019; 11(1): 13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0470-7] [PMID: 30704514]
[67]
Bastin C, Bahri MA, Bernard C, Hustinx R, Salmon E. Frontal hypometabolism in neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance. J Nucl Med 2021; 62(12): 1783-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.260497] [PMID: 33789936]
[68]
Migliaccio R, Agosta F, Possin KL, et al. Mapping the progression of atrophy in early - and late - onset Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2015; 46(2): 351-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-142292] [PMID: 25737041]
[69]
Manera AL, Dadar M, Collins DL, Ducharme S. Ventricular features as reliable differentiators between bvFTD and other dementias. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 33: 102947.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102947] [PMID: 35134704]
[70]
Halliday G. Pathology and hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16(11): 862-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30343-5] [PMID: 29029840]
[71]
Rao YL, Ganaraja B, Murlimanju BV, Joy T, Krishnamurthy A, Agrawal A. Hippocampus and its involvement in Alzheimer's disease: A review. 3 Biotech 2022; 12(2): 55.
[72]
Eldaief MC, Brickhouse M, Katsumi Y, et al. Atrophy in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia spans multiple large-scale prefrontal and temporal networks. Brain 2023; 146(11): 4476-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awad167] [PMID: 37201288]
[73]
Hurley RS, Lapin B, Jones SE, et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in hippocampal volume related to memory in left and right temporal variants of frontotemporal degeneration. Front Neurol 2024; 15: 1374827.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1374827] [PMID: 38742046]
[74]
van de Pol LA, Hensel A, van der Flier WM, et al. Hippocampal atrophy on MRI in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77(4): 439-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.075341] [PMID: 16306153]
[75]
Wu J, Zhao K, Li Z, et al. A systematic analysis of diagnostic performance for Alzheimer’s disease using structural MRI. Psychoradiology 2022; 2(1): 1-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkac001] [PMID: 38665142]
[76]
Lombardi G, Crescioli G, Cavedo E, et al. Structural magnetic resonance imaging for the early diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Libr 2020; 3(3): CD009628.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009628.pub2] [PMID: 32119112]
[77]
Casagrande CC, Rempe MP, Springer SD, Wilson TW. Comprehensive review of task-based neuroimaging studies of cognitive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease using electrophysiological methods. Ageing Res Rev 2023; 88: 101950.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2023.101950] [PMID: 37156399]
[78]
Agosta F, Pievani M, Geroldi C, Copetti M, Frisoni GB, Filippi M. Resting state fMRI in Alzheimer’s disease: Beyond the default mode network. Neurobiol Aging 2012; 33(8): 1564-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.06.007] [PMID: 21813210]
[79]
Passamonti L, Tsvetanov KA, Jones PS, et al. Neuroinflammation and functional connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease: Interactive influences on cognitive performance. J Neurosci 2019; 39(36): 7218-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2574-18.2019] [PMID: 31320450]
[80]
Huang J, Jung JY, Nam CS. Estimating effective connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease progression: A dynamic causal modeling study. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16: 1060936.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.1060936] [PMID: 36590062]
[81]
Dickerson BC, Salat DH, Greve DN, et al. Increased hippocampal activation in mild cognitive impairment compared to normal aging and AD. Neurology 2005; 65(3): 404-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000171450.97464.49] [PMID: 16087905]
[82]
Wu X, Li R, Fleisher AS, et al. Altered default mode network connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease—A resting functional MRI and bayesian network study. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32(11): 1868-81.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21153] [PMID: 21259382]
[83]
Ng ASL, Wang J, Ng KK, et al. Distinct network topology in Alzheimer’s disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021; 13(1): 13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00752-w] [PMID: 33407913]
[84]
Rytty R, Nikkinen J, Paavola L, et al. GroupICA dual regression analysis of resting state networks in a behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 461.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00461] [PMID: 23986673]
[85]
Whitwell JL. FTD spectrum: Neuroimaging across the FTD spectrum. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2019; 165: 187-223.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2019.05.009] [PMID: 31481163]
[86]
Tavares TP, Mitchell DGV, Coleman KKL, Finger E. Neural correlates of reversal learning in frontotemporal dementia. Cortex 2021; 143: 92-108.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.06.016] [PMID: 34399309]
[87]
Rombouts SARB, van Swieten JC, Pijnenburg YAL, Goekoop R, Barkhof F, Scheltens P. Loss of frontal fMRI activation in early frontotemporal dementia compared to early AD. Neurology 2003; 60(12): 1904-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000069462.11741.EC] [PMID: 12821731]
[88]
Sadeghi MA, Stevens D, Kundu S, et al. Detecting Alzheimer’s disease stages and frontotemporal dementia in time courses of resting-state fMRI data using a machine learning approach. J Imaging Inform Med 2024; 37(6): 2768-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01101-1] [PMID: 38780666]
[89]
Xue C, Kowshik SS, Lteif D, et al. AI-based differential diagnosis of dementia etiologies on multimodal data. Nat Med 2024; 30(10): 2977-89.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03118-z] [PMID: 38965435]
[90]
Karlsson L, Vogel J, Arvidsson I, et al. Machine learning prediction of tau-PET in Alzheimer’s disease using plasma, MRI, and clinical data. Alzheimers Dement 2025; 21(2): e14600.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.14600] [PMID: 39985487]
[91]
Wahul RM, Ambadekar S, Dhanvijay DM, et al. Multimodal approaches and AI-driven innovations in dementia diagnosis: A systematic review. Discover Artificial Intelligence 2025; 5(1): 96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00358-x]
[92]
Maity R, Raja Sankari VM, Snekhalatha U, et al. Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease in structural and functional MRI. Front Med 2024; 11: 1520878.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1520878] [PMID: 39726682]
[93]
Hojjati SH, Ebrahimzadeh A, Babajani-Feremi A. Identification of the early stage of Alzheimer’s disease using structural MRI and resting-state fMRI. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 904.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00904] [PMID: 31543860]
[94]
Nakamura A, Cuesta P, Kato T, et al. Early functional network alterations in asymptomatic elders at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 6517.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06876-8] [PMID: 28747760]
[95]
Ereira S, Waters S, Razi A, Marshall CR. Early detection of dementia with default-mode network effective connectivity. Nat Ment Health 2024; 2(7): 787-800.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00259-5]
[96]
Sheline YI, Raichle ME. Resting state functional connectivity in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 74(5): 340-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.028] [PMID: 23290495]
[97]
Alarjani MS, Almarri BA. Brain functional connectivity analysis of fMRI-based Alzheimer’s disease data. Front Med 2025; 12: 1540297.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1540297] [PMID: 40046917]
[98]
Yousem DM. The economics of functional magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical and research. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2014; 24(4): 717-24.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2014.07.007] [PMID: 25441510]
[99]
Najafpour Z, Fatemi A, Goudarzi Z, Goudarzi R, Shayanfard K, Noorizadeh F. Cost-effectiveness of neuroimaging technologies in management of psychiatric and insomnia disorders: A meta-analysis and prospective cost analysis. J Neuroradiol 2021; 48(5): 348-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2020.12.003] [PMID: 33383065]
[100]
Balachandrasekaran A, Cohen AL, Afacan O, Warfield SK, Gholipour A. Reducing the effects of motion artifacts in fMRI: A structured matrix completion approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2022; 41(1): 172-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2021.3107829] [PMID: 34432631]
[101]
Bullock M, Jackson GD, Abbott DF. Artifact reduction in simultaneous EEG-fMRI: A systematic review of methods and contemporary usage. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 622719.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.622719] [PMID: 33776886]
[102]
Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Bang W, Bennett DA. Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia cases in community-dwelling older persons. Neurology 2007; 69(24): 2197-204.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000271090.28148.24] [PMID: 17568013]
[103]
Forrest SL, Kovacs GG. Current concepts of mixed pathologies in neurodegenerative diseases. Can J Neurol Sci 2023; 50(3): 329-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2022.34] [PMID: 35356856]
[104]
Rahimi J, Kovacs GG. Prevalence of mixed pathologies in the aging brain. Alzheimers Res Ther 2014; 6(9): 82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-014-0082-1] [PMID: 25419243]
[105]
Fierini F. Mixed dementia: Neglected clinical entity or nosographic artifice? J Neurol Sci 2020; 410: 116662.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.116662] [PMID: 31911281]
[106]
McAleese KE, Colloby SJ, Attems J, Thomas AJ, Francis PT. Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia in the UK’s Brains for Dementia Research cohort. Alzheimers Dement 2020; 16(S2): e043354.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.043354]
[107]
Alafuzoff I, Libard S. Mixed brain pathology is the most common cause of cognitive impairment in the elderly. J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 78(1): 453-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200925] [PMID: 33016922]
[108]
Liang Y, Bo K, Meyyappan S, Ding M. Decoding fMRI data with support vector machines and deep neural networks. J Neurosci Methods 2024; 401: 110004.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.110004] [PMID: 37914001]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite