Recent Patents on Biotechnology

Recent Patents on Biotechnology

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1872-2083
ISSN (Online): 2212-4012

Back Subscribe
Review Article

Recent Patents of Stent Grafts for Intravascular Aortic Repair

Author(s): Yiwen Wang*orcid of author and Yuxin Zhang

Volume 20, Issue 3, 2026

Published on: 23 July, 2025

Page: [325 - 341] Pages: 17

DOI: 10.2174/0118722083355380250716073539

Price: $65

Become a Editorial Board Member
Become a Reviewer
Become a Editor
Become a Section Editor

Abstract

Introduction: Endovascular aortic repair involves the placement of stents through minimally invasive methods to seal rupture sites near the aortic inflow tract, thereby preventing blood entry into the false lumen and promoting thrombosis, which reduces the risk of aortic rupture. Endovascular stents typically consist of a metal framework and a flexible membrane graft designed to reopen obstructed aortic segments and maintain blood flow through the true lumen. Consequently, stents are widely used to treat aortic expansion diseases and aortic occlusive stenosis. However, traditional stents have limitations in terms of adaptability to complex anatomical structures, long-term durability, biomechanical stability, and reliance on radial support force for fixation, lacking active fixation mechanisms. These shortcomings remain the primary causes of postoperative complications, significantly impacting the quality of life for patients with aortic dissection.

Methods: Integrating patent and academic literature, the research status of the endovascular stent was discussed in depth, and the main factors for the optimal design of the stent (geometry, pattern configuration, additional fixtures, and optimization methods) were analyzed and summarized according to the complications targeted by the repair device.

Results: The composition structure, working principle, and development status of the stent grafts under review are elaborated in detail. Stent grafts attempt to alleviate postoperative complications through three approaches: enhancing the flexibility of the stent framework, improving the fit between the vessel wall and the stent, and reducing vascular injury. Blood flow guiding channels are established to alleviate the obstruction of branch blood flow. Additional self-anchoring devices are added to adapt to the dynamic remodeling of blood vessels.

Discussion: The effects of various factors, including geometric parameters, structural design, and parameter optimization techniques, on the optimization of stent primary mechanical performance are discussed. The current research status of functional improvement methods for stents is also summarized.

Conclusion: Refining the quantitative relationship between stent structural parameters and mechanical performance, as well as exploring the balance criteria between flexibility and radial support force, represent promising directions for future development. These objectives necessitate further in-depth analysis and research.

Keywords: Vascular, aortic dissection, endovascular aortic repair, endovascular aortic repair complication, stent-graft design, stent optimization.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Li G, Li J, Deng H, Wei X, Li N. Differences in in-hospital and follow-up outcomes between non-A Non-B aortic dissection and type B aortic dissection treated by endovascular based treatment. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2024; 58(6): 602-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15385744241249293] [PMID: 38649827]
[2]
LeMaire SA, Russell L. Epidemiology of thoracic aortic dissection. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011; 8(2): 103-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.187] [PMID: 21173794]
[3]
Yin ZQ, Han H, Yan X, Zheng QJ. Research progress on the pathogenesis of aortic dissection. Curr Probl Cardiol 2023; 48(8): 101249.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101249] [PMID: 35568084]
[4]
Nienaber CA, Clough RE, Sakalihasan N, et al. Aortic dissection. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2(1): 16053.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.53] [PMID: 27440162]
[5]
Silaschi M, Byrne J, Wendler O. Aortic dissection: Medical, interventional and surgical management. Heart 2017; 103(1): 78-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308284] [PMID: 27733536]
[6]
Hu SS. Aortic disease and peripheral artery disease. J Geriatr Cardiol 2024; 21(10): 931-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2024.10.008] [PMID: 39619360]
[7]
Payne D, Böckler D, Weaver F, et al. Five-year outcomes of endovascular treatment for aortic dissection from the global registry for endovascular aortic treatment. J Vasc Surg 2024; 80(4): 1035-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.055] [PMID: 38825212]
[8]
Hsieh RW, Hsu TC, Lee M, et al. Comparison of type B dissection by open, endovascular, and medical treatments. J Vasc Surg 2019; 70(6): 1792-1800.e3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.062] [PMID: 31176640]
[9]
Jones AD, Waduud MA, Walker P, Stocken D, Bailey MA, Scott DJA. Meta‐analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years. BJS Open 2019; 3(5): 572-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50178] [PMID: 31592091]
[10]
Canonge J, Jayet J, Heim F, et al. Comprehensive review of physician modified aortic stent grafts: Technical and clinical outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 61(4): 560-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.01.019] [PMID: 33589325]
[11]
Rovas G, Reymond P, Steenberghe MV, et al. In vivo evaluation of a novel compliance-matching vascular graft. bioRxiv 2023; 2023.11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.10.566623]
[12]
Braverman AC. Aortic dissection in marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82(21): 2018-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.054] [PMID: 37930286]
[13]
Vanmaele A, Rastogi V, Oliveira-Pinto J, et al. Single centre evaluation of the proposal of the European society for vascular surgery abdominal aortic aneurysm guidelines to stratify surveillance after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2025; 69(5): 744-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.01.042] [PMID: 39909310]
[14]
Ierardi AM, Pesapane F, Patella F, et al. Operative management of type II endoleaks after aortic endovascular repair. In: Visceral Vessels and Aortic Repair. Cham: Springer 2019.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94761-7_9]
[15]
Chun JY, de Haan M, Maleux G, Osman A, Cannavale A, Morgan R. CIRSE standards of practice on management of endoleaks following endovascular aneurysm repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47(2): 161-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03629-1] [PMID: 38216742]
[16]
Kim HO, Yim NY, Kim JK, Kang YJ, Lee BC. Endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A comprehensive review. Korean J Radiol 2019; 20(8): 1247-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0927] [PMID: 31339013]
[17]
Canonge J, Heim F, Chakfé N, Coscas R, Cochennec F, Jayet J. Mechanical performance assessment of physician modified aortic stent graft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65(3): 435-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.11.004] [PMID: 36343747]
[18]
Van Gerwen A, Gallala S, Kerselaers L, Aerden D, Debing E. Stentgraft limb occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair: Incidence and risk factors. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2024; 58(1): 34-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15385744231186276] [PMID: 37400356]
[19]
Zhang L, Li N, Zhang X, et al. Computed tomography angiography-confirmed aortic in-stents floating thrombus after endovascular stenting: A retrospective study. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024; 14(3): 2556-67.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-1446] [PMID: 38545074]
[20]
Khan OF, Sefton MV. Endothelialized biomaterials for tissue engineering applications in vivo. Trends Biotechnol 2011; 29(8): 379-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.03.004] [PMID: 21549438]
[21]
Pan C, Han Y, Lu J. Structural design of vascular stents: A review. Micromachines 2021; 12(7): 770.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi12070770] [PMID: 34210099]
[22]
Mi HY, Jiang Y, Jing X, et al. Fabrication of triple-layered vascular grafts composed of silk fibers, polyacrylamide hydrogel, and polyurethane nanofibers with biomimetic mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng C 2019; 98: 241-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.126] [PMID: 30813024]
[23]
Zia AW, Liu R, Wu X. Structural design and mechanical performance of composite vascular grafts. Biodes Manuf 2022; 5(4): 757-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00201-7]
[24]
Acher C, Acher CW, Marks E, Wynn M. Intraoperative neuroprotective interventions prevent spinal cord ischemia and injury in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63(6): 1458-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.062] [PMID: 26968081]
[25]
Montandrau O, Weisslinger SJ, Philip I, Koskas F, Beaussier M. Perioperative spinal cord ischemia in thoracoabdominal aortic surgery: Status report in 2024. Prat Anesth Réanim 2024; 28(2): 86-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pratan.2024.03.008]
[26]
Chen SW, Lee KB, Napolitano MA, et al. Complications and management of the thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Aorta 2020; 8(3): 49-58.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714089] [PMID: 33152785]
[27]
Goh JHF, Hwang NC. Stent graft-induced aortic wall injury—anesthesia pitfalls and pearls for the thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedure. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37(5): 683-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2023.01.017] [PMID: 36822890]
[28]
Charlton-Ouw KM, Ikeno Y, Bokamper M, Zakhary E, Smeds MR. Aortic endograft sizing and endoleak, reintervention, and mortality following endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74(5): 1519-1526.e2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.045] [PMID: 33940075]
[29]
Kyodo A, Okura H, Okamura A, et al. Incidence and characteristics of incomplete stent apposition in calcified lesions: An optical coherence tomography study. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2022; 41: 55-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2021.12.032] [PMID: 34998648]
[30]
Daye D, Walker TG. Complications of endovascular aneurysm repair of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: Evaluation and management. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2018; 8 (Suppl. 1): S138-56.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.09.17] [PMID: 29850426]
[31]
Xiang D, Chai B, Huang J, et al. The impact of oversizing in thoracic endovascular aortic repair on long-term outcomes in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: A single-center retrospective study. J Endovasc Ther 2024; 31(5): 862-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028231166282] [PMID: 37078474]
[32]
Bae M, Jeon CH. Optimal sizing of aortic stent graft for blunt thoracic aortic injury considering hypotension-related decrease in aortic diameter. J Endovasc Ther 2024; 31(4): 651-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028221134894] [PMID: 36342200]
[33]
Stavropoulos SW, Charagundla SR. Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology 2007; 243(3): 641-55.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2433051649] [PMID: 17517926]
[34]
Verhoeven ELG, Katsargyris A, Bachoo P, et al. Real-world performance of the new C3 Gore Excluder stent-graft: 1-year results from the European C3 module of the global registry for endovascular aortic treatment (GREAT). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 48(2): 131-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.04.009] [PMID: 24878234]
[35]
Skrypnik D, Kalmykov E, Bischoff MS, et al. Late endograft migration after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2024; 31(1): 7-18.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028221109455] [PMID: 35822261]
[36]
Kamada K, Shingaki M, Nakanishi K, Ishikawa K, Koya A, Morishita K. Stent graft migration due to structural failure nine months after thoracic endovascular aortic repair using valiant navion. EJVES Vasc Forum 2023; 60: 77-80.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2023.10.002] [PMID: 38035119]
[37]
Thomas WR, Karkhanis S, Hopkins J, Duddy M. Translumbar embolization of type II endoleaks: 12 years of experience at a regional vascular centre. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2020; 54(5): 389-94.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1538574420918972] [PMID: 32281501]
[38]
Parsa P, Das GJ, McNally M, Chandra V. Endotension: What do we know and not know about this enigmatic complication of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74(2): 639-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.018] [PMID: 33813025]
[39]
Gozzo C, Caruana G, Cannella R, et al. CT angiography for the assessment of EVAR complications: A pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2022; 13(1): 5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01112-4] [PMID: 35032231]
[40]
Aucoin VJ, Motyl CM, Novak Z, et al. Predictors and outcomes of spinal cord injury following complex branched/fenestrated endovascular aortic repair in the US Aortic Research Consortium. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77(6): 1578-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.205] [PMID: 37059239]
[41]
Yazar O, Willems S, Salemans PB, Wong CY, van Grinsven B, Bouwman LH. Treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms: Compatibility of the E-liac stent graft (Artivion®, Iliac Branch Device) with endurant II or IIs (Medtronic®, EVAR). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023; 46(2): 187-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03352-3] [PMID: 36624291]
[42]
van Zeggeren L, Bastos Gonçalves F, van Herwaarden JA, et al. Incidence and treatment results of Endurant endograft occlusion. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57(5): 1246-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.069] [PMID: 23395203]
[43]
Basra M, Hussain P, Li M, et al. Factors related to limb occlusion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 99: 312-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.035] [PMID: 37858668]
[44]
Kouvelos G, Nana P, Brodis A, et al. A meta-analysis of mid-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm sealing. J Endovasc Ther 2023; 30(5): 664-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028221098706] [PMID: 35674455]
[45]
Battista F, Ficarelli R, Perrotta A, et al. The fluid-dynamics of endo vascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) system failure. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2021; 12(3): 300-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13239-021-00520-3] [PMID: 33565030]
[46]
Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67(1): 2-77.e2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044] [PMID: 29268916]
[47]
Aras T, Tayeh M, Aswad A, Sharkawy M, Majd P. Exploring type IIIb Endoleaks: A literature review to identify possible physical mechanisms and implications. J Clin Med 2024; 13(15): 4293.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154293] [PMID: 39124560]
[48]
Roeder BA, Kratzberg J, Dierking WK, Rasmussen EE, Oehlenschlaeger B, Jensen KM. Low profile nonsymmetrical bare alignment stents with graft U.S. Patent 20090306763, 2009.
[49]
Fu W, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang T. Plastic covered stent for aortic dissection and aortic dissection stent U.S.Patent 10874533, 2020.
[50]
Wang Y, Fu W, Li J, Zhang T. Aortic bare stent and aortic dissection stent U.S. Patent 10799375,, 2020.
[51]
Hofferberth SC, Foley PT, Newcomb AE, et al. Combined proximal endografting with distal bare-metal stenting for management of aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93(1): 95-102.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.06.106] [PMID: 22133900]
[52]
Lombardi JV, Cambria RP, Nienaber CA, et al. Prospective multicenter clinical trial (STABLE) on the endovascular treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection using a composite device design. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55(3): 629-640.e2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.022] [PMID: 22169668]
[53]
Wang Y, Liu C, Zhang D. Thoracic aortic covered stent EP Patent 3075352, 2021.
[54]
Kaji S. Acute medical management of aortic dissection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67(2): 203-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-018-1030-y] [PMID: 30456591]
[55]
Solovay KS, Letendre RP. Aortic graft having a precursor gasket for repairing an abdominal aortic aneurysm U.S. Patent 006290731, 2001.
[56]
Schulick A, Singh D. Stent and method of stenting an abdominal aortic aneurysm U.S. Patent 11419714,, 2022.
[57]
Mitra A. Novel device for treatment of aortic dissections W.O. Patent 2022150879, 2022.
[58]
Guo W, Wang Y, Li A. Membrane stent applicable to interventional treatment of abdominal aortic diseases E.P. Patent 3733125,, 2020.
[59]
Kavteladze Z, Kavteladze D. Bifurcated stent graft system for the treatment of the abdominal aortic aneurysm and a method of treatment of the abdominal aortic aneurysm using the system U.S. Patent 011419715, 2022.
[60]
Majercak DC, Park JS. Twisted anchoring barb for sten tof abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) device U.S. Patent 8372143, 2013.
[61]
Roselli EE. Frame structures, stent grafts incorporating the same, and methods for extended aortic repair U.S. Patent 10299946,, 2019.
[62]
Yang F, Zheng W, Xiao J. Aortic stent-graft. U.S. Patent 20150018933,, 2015.
[63]
Spindler R, Skender D. Aortic stent graft with durable suture attachment sites U.S. Patent 20210137670, 2021.
[64]
Zhou SSN, How TV, Vallabhaneni SR, et al. Comparison of the fixation strength of standard and fenestrated stent-grafts for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2007; 14(2): 168-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152660280701400208] [PMID: 17484532]
[65]
Doberne JW, Sabe AA, Vekstein AM, et al. Stent graft-induced aortic wall injury: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 114(3): 684-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.01.028] [PMID: 35150615]
[66]
Jordan WD, de Vries JPPM, Ouriel K, et al. Midterm outcome of EndoAnchors for the prevention of endoleak and stent-graft migration in patients with challenging proximal aortic neck anatomy. J Endovasc Ther 2015; 22(2): 163-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1526602815574685] [PMID: 25809354]
[67]
Muhs BE, Jordan W, Ouriel K, Rajaee S, de Vries JP. Matched cohort comparison of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with and without EndoAnchors. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67(6): 1699-707.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.059] [PMID: 29248241]
[68]
Giudice R, Borghese O, Sbenaglia G, et al. The use of EndoAnchors in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with challenging proximal neck: Single-centre experience. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 2019; 8: 2048004019845508.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004019845508] [PMID: 31041098]
[69]
Curley D, Sindhar J, Howard A, Zayed H, Saha P. Device profile of EndoAnchors for aortic stent graft implantation: Overview of their safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2023; 20(8): 615-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2221787] [PMID: 37278218]
[70]
Bi J, Cui D, Liu Z, et al. Stent graft-induced high wall stress promoted aortic wall failure and aortic wall injurious complications after TEVAR: A study of numerical simulation and bioinformatics analysis based on pig models. J Endovasc Ther 2024.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028241283324] [PMID: 39342458]
[71]
Qiao Y, Mao L, Wang Y, et al. Hemodynamic effects of stent-graft introducer sheath during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2022; 21(2): 419-31.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01542-5] [PMID: 34994871]
[72]
Mortier P, Holzapfel GA, De Beule M, et al. A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: Comparison of three drug-eluting stents. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38(1): 88-99.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9836-5] [PMID: 19898936]
[73]
Vanaei S, Hashemi M, Solouk A, et al. Manufacturing, processing, and characterization of self-expanding metallic stents: A comprehensive review. Bioengineering 2024; 11(10): 983.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11100983] [PMID: 39451359]
[74]
Joo HC, Youn YN, Ko YG, et al. Comparison of open surgical versus hybrid endovascular repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms with distal arch involvement. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10(6): 3548-57.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.05.127] [PMID: 30069352]
[75]
Liu Z, Wu L, Yang J, et al. Thoracic aorta stent grafts design in terms of biomechanical investigations into flexibility. Math Biosci Eng 2020; 18(1): 800-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2021042] [PMID: 33525119]
[76]
Shen X, Jiang JB, Zhu HF, Deng YQ, Ji S. Numerical investigation of the flexibility of a new self-expandable tapered stent. J Mech 2020; 36(4): 577-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jmech.2020.11]
[77]
García A, Peña E, Martínez MA. Influence of geometrical parameters on radial force during self-expanding stent deployment. Application for a variable radial stiffness stent. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012; 10: 166-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.006] [PMID: 22520428]
[78]
Lin J, Guidoin R, Du J, et al. An in vitro twist fatigue test of fabric stent-grafts supported by Z-stents vs. ringed stents. Materials 2016; 9(2): 113.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9020113] [PMID: 28787913]
[79]
Zhao Y, Yan S, Si Y, Song C. Effects of different geometric parameters on flexibility of Z-shaped stent-grafts. Yiyong Shengwu Lixue 2019; (6): E007-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.16156/j.1004-7220.2019.01.002]
[80]
Scott JCR, Doman DA, Johnston CR. A parametric analysis of endovascular stent geometry manipulation on radial force performance. J Med Device 2020; 14(4): 041004.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4048233]
[81]
Beyi AFM, Ismail AE, Taib I, Ibrahim MN. Stent classifications and effect of geometries on stent behaviour using finite element method. Int J Mech Eng Robot Res 2020; 9(3): 329-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.9.3.329-340]
[82]
Jayendiran R, Nour B, Ruimi A. Computational analysis of Nitinol stent-graft for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): Crimping, sealing and fluid-structure interaction (FSI). Int J Cardiol 2020; 304: 164-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.091] [PMID: 31791620]
[83]
Kumar GP, Cui F. Stent design parameters and crimpability. Int J Cardiol 2016; 223: 552-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.225] [PMID: 27557485]
[84]
Yan S, Song C, Si Y, Zhao Y. Design of non-equal-strut stent hoops for structural optimization of thoracic aortic stent-grafts. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2022; 31(1): 58-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2020.1745849] [PMID: 32233714]
[85]
Vellaparambil R, Han WS, Di Giovanni P, Avril S. Computational comparison of the mechanical behavior of aortic stent-grafts derived from auxetic unit cells. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2024; 15(2): 199-210.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13239-023-00706-x] [PMID: 38110763]
[86]
Ma T, Dong ZH, Wang S, Meng ZY, Chen YY, Fu WG. Computational investigation of interaction between stent graft and aorta in retrograde type A dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2018; 68(6): 14S-21S-21S.e2.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.008] [PMID: 30064843]
[87]
Rovas G, Bikia V, Stergiopulos N. Design and computational optimization of compliance-matching aortic grafts. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11: 1179174.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1179174] [PMID: 37456727]
[88]
Weidman JM, Desai M, Iftekhar A, et al. Engineering goals for future thoracic endografts-how can we make them more effective? Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2013; 56(1): 92-102.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2013.05.001] [PMID: 23993242]
[89]
Liu Z, Chen G, Ong C, et al. Multi-objective design optimization of stent-grafts for the aortic arch. Mater Des 2023; 227: 111748.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111748]
[90]
Shen X, Ni Z. Multi-objective design optimization of coronary stent mechanical properties. Adv Sci Lett 2011; 4(3): 835-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/asl.2011.1307]
[91]
Tammareddi S, Sun G, Li Q. Multiobjective robust optimization of coronary stents. Mater Des 2016; 90: 682-92.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.153]
[92]
Li H, Wang X, Wei Y, et al. Multi-objective optimizations of biodegradable polymer stent structure and stent microinjection molding process. Polymers 2017; 9(1): 20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym9010020] [PMID: 30970706]
[93]
Blair RW, Dunne NJ, Lennon AB, Menary GH. Multi-objective optimisation of material properties and strut geometry for poly(L-lactic acid) coronary stents using response surface methodology. PLoS One 2019; 14(8): e0218768.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218768] [PMID: 31449528]
[94]
Vahabli E, Mann J, Heidari BS, et al. The technological advancement to engineer next‐generation stent‐grafts: design, material, and fabrication techniques. Adv Healthc Mater 2022; 11(13): 2200271.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202200271] [PMID: 35481675]
[95]
Korei N, Solouk A, Haghbin Nazarpak M, Nouri A. A review on design characteristics and fabrication methods of metallic cardiovascular stents. Mater Today Commun 2022; 31: 103467.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103467]
[96]
Garcia-Villen F, López-Zárraga F, Viseras C, et al. Three-dimensional printing as a cutting-edge, versatile and personalizable vascular stent manufacturing procedure: Toward tailor-made medical devices. Int J Bioprint 2023; 9(2): 664.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.664] [PMID: 37065659]
[97]
Demanget N, Duprey A, Badel P, et al. Finite element analysis of the mechanical performances of 8 marketed aortic stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther 2013; 20(4): 523-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1583/12-4063.1] [PMID: 23914862]
[98]
Putra NK, Palar PS, Anzai H, Shimoyama K, Ohta M. Comparative study between different strut’s cross section shape on minimizing low wall shear stress along stent vicinity via surrogate-based optimization. In: Advances in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. Cham: Springer 2018; pp. 2097-109.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67988-4_155]
[99]
Vellaparambil R, Han WS, Di Giovanni P, Avril S. Potential of auxetic designs in endovascular aortic repair: A computational study of their mechanical performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2023; 138: 105644.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105644] [PMID: 36608533]
[100]
Gupta K, Meena K. A novel double arrowhead auxetic coronary stent. Comput Biol Med 2023; 166: 107525.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107525] [PMID: 37778216]
[101]
Zhou Y, Pan Y, Sun B, Gao Q. Mechanical properties of an improved flexible auxetic metamaterial and its application in self-expanding vascular stents. Eur J Mech A, Solids 2024; 106: 105345.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105345]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite