Recent Advances in Anti-Infective Drug Discovery

Recent Advances in Anti-Infective Drug Discovery

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2772-4344
ISSN (Online): 2772-4352

Back Subscribe
Research Article

Computational Investigation of Natural Substances as SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors: A Virtual Screening Method

Author(s): Deepak K. Lokwani*orcid of author, Sangita R. Chavan, Shirish P. Jain, Samiksha R. Shengokar and Titiksh L. Devale

Volume 21, Issue 1, 2026

Published on: 17 July, 2025

Page: [44 - 58] Pages: 15

DOI: 10.2174/0127724344379865250709163918

Price: $65

Become a Editorial Board Member
Become a Reviewer
Become a Editor
Become a Section Editor

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused the by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has had a profound impact on public health, overburdening healthcare systems, and disrupting global economies. Moreover, the absence of specific antiviral drugs remains a major challenge in COVID-19 treatment. The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) is a crucial therapeutic target due to its essential role in viral replication. The objective of this study was to identify natural compounds with potential inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, which could be used alone or in combination with repositioned drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.

Methods: A total of 224,205 natural compounds from the ZINC database were virtually screened against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro using a sequential molecular docking protocol with increasing levels of exhaustiveness. The top 88 compounds were further evaluated using MM-GBSA calculations to determine their binding free energies. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations (100 ns) were conducted for the top four compounds to assess complex stability and ligand interactions. Structural stability and protein-ligand interactions were assessed using various statistical parameters. Post-MD binding free energy calculations were also performed.

Results: Four compounds, ZINC000085626103, ZINC000085625768, ZINC000085488571, and ZINC000085569275, were identified based on their docking scores (ranging from - 11.876 to -12.682 kcal/mol) and MM-GBSA binding energies (ranging from -50.11 to - 64.8 kcal/mol). All these compounds formed stable complexes with Mpro during MD simulations, with ZINC000085488571 exhibiting the lowest protein RMSD (0.15 ± 0.02 nm) and RMSF (0.10 ± 0.04 nm). These compounds interacted with key active site residues and maintained stable hydrogen bonding and compact structures throughout the simulation. Post-simulation binding free energy values ranged from -38.29 to -18.07 kcal/mol, further indicating strong and stable binding affinities.

Discussion: The in silico screening results confirmed the strong binding affinity and structural stability of the selected natural compounds at the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro active site. The MD simulation results further highlighted consistent engagement with catalytically relevant residues, indicating their potential for inhibitory activity.

Conclusion: This study identifies four natural compounds with strong binding affinity and structural stability against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, supporting their candidacy for further investigation as potential antiviral agents for COVID-19 treatment.

Keywords: COVID-19, Mpro inhibitor, ZINC database, molecular docking, MD simulations, MMGBSA.

Graphical Abstract

[1]
Kumari M, Lu RM, Li MC, et al. A critical overview of current progress for COVID-19: Development of vaccines, antiviral drugs, and therapeutic antibodies. J Biomed Sci 2022; 29(1): 68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12929-022-00852-9] [PMID: 36096815]
[2]
Sheahan TP, Frieman MB. The continued epidemic threat of SARS-CoV-2 and implications for the future of global public health. Curr Opin Virol 2020; 40: 37-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2020.05.010] [PMID: 32569751]
[3]
Rieder AS, Deniz BF, Netto CA, Wyse ATS. A review of in silico research, SARS-CoV-2, and neurodegeneration: Focus on papain-Like protease. Neurotox Res 2022; 40(5): 1553-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12640-022-00542-2] [PMID: 35917086]
[4]
Vitiello A, Ferrara F, Auti AM, Di Domenico M, Boccellino M. Advances in the Omicron variant development. J Intern Med 2022; 292(1): 81-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joim.13478] [PMID: 35289434]
[5]
Suah JL, Tng BH, Tok PSK, et al. Real-world effectiveness of homologous and heterologous BNT162b2, CoronaVac, and AZD1222 booster vaccination against Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerg Microbes Infect 2022; 11(1): 1343-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2022.2072773] [PMID: 35499301]
[6]
Su H, Zhou F, Huang Z, et al. Molecular insights into small‐molecule drug discovery for SARS‐CoV‐2. Angew Chem Int Ed 2021; 60(18): 9789-802.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.202008835] [PMID: 32729180]
[7]
Jackson CB, Farzan M, Chen B, Choe H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2022; 23(1): 3-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41580-021-00418-x] [PMID: 34611326]
[8]
Kneller DW, Phillips G, O’Neill HM, et al. Structural plasticity of SARS-CoV-2 3CL Mpro active site cavity revealed by room temperature X-ray crystallography. Nat Commun 2020; 11(1): 3202.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16954-7] [PMID: 32581217]
[9]
Kronenberger T, Laufer SA, Pillaiyar T. COVID-19 therapeutics: Small-molecule drug development targeting SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Drug Discov Today 2023; 28(6): 103579.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103579] [PMID: 37028502]
[10]
Cui W, Yang K, Yang H. Recent progress in the drug development targeting SARS-CoV-2 main protease as treatment for COVID-19. Front Mol Biosci 2020; 7(7): 616341.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.616341] [PMID: 33344509]
[11]
Jin Z, Du X, Xu Y, et al. Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 2020; 582(7811): 289-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2223-y] [PMID: 32272481]
[12]
Patel CN, Jani SP, Prasanth Kumar S, Modi KM, Kumar Y. Computational investigation of natural compounds as potential main protease (Mpro) inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 virus. Comput Biol Med 2022; 151(Pt A): 106318.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106318] [PMID: 36423529]
[13]
Dai W, Zhang B, Jiang XM, et al. Structure-based design of antiviral drug candidates targeting the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Science 2020; 368(6497): 1331-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4489] [PMID: 32321856]
[14]
Kumar A, Choudhir G, Shukla SK, et al. Identification of phytochemical inhibitors against main protease of COVID-19 using molecular modeling approaches. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2021; 39(10): 3760-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1772112] [PMID: 32448034]
[15]
Pandey P, Rane JS, Chatterjee A, et al. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein of COVID-19 with naturally occurring phytochemicals: An in silico study for drug development. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2021; 39(16): 6306-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1796811] [PMID: 32698689]
[16]
Lokwani D, Azad R, Sarkate A, Reddanna P, Shinde D. Structure Based Library Design (SBLD) for new 1,4-dihydropyrimidine scaffold as simultaneous COX-1/COX-2 and 5-LOX inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 2015; 23(15): 4533-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2015.06.008] [PMID: 26122769]
[17]
Rani I, Kalsi A, Kaur G, et al. Modern drug discovery applications for the identification of novel candidates for COVID-19 infections. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 80: 104125.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104125] [PMID: 35845863]
[18]
Das AP, Agarwal SM. Recent advances in the area of plant-based anti-cancer drug discovery using computational approaches. Mol Divers 2024; 28(2): 901-25.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11030-022-10590-7] [PMID: 36670282]
[19]
Koes DR, Baumgartner MP, Camacho CJ. Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise. J Chem Inf Model 2013; 53(8): 1893-904.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci300604z] [PMID: 23379370]
[20]
Tiwari SV, Sarkate AP, Lokwani DK, et al. Explorations of novel pyridine-pyrimidine hybrid phosphonate derivatives as aurora kinase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2022; 67: 128747.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2022.128747] [PMID: 35476959]
[21]
Thorat NM, Khodade VS, Ingale AP, Lokwani DK, Sarkate AP, Thopate SR. Molecular docking studies and application of 6-(1-Arylmethanamino)-2-Phenyl-4 H -Chromen-4-ones as potent antibacterial agents. Polycycl Aromat Compd 2023; 43(10): 8653-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10406638.2022.2150238]
[22]
Kardile RA, Sarkate AP, Lokwani DK, Tiwari SV, Azad R, Thopate SR. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel quinoline derivatives as small molecule mutant EGFR inhibitors targeting resistance in NSCLC: In vitro screening and ADME predictions. Eur J Med Chem 2023; 245(Pt 1): 114889.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114889] [PMID: 36375337]
[23]
Mohite P, Lokwani DK, Sakle NS. Exploring the therapeutic potential of SGLT2 inhibitors in cancer treatment: Integrating in silico and in vitro investigations. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2024; 397(8): 6107-19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-03021-x] [PMID: 38416196]
[24]
Yang M, Bo Z, Xu T, Xu B, Wang D, Zheng H. Uni-GBSA: An open-source and web-based automatic workflow to perform MM/GB(PB)SA calculations for virtual screening. Brief Bioinform 2023; 24(4): bbad218.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbad218] [PMID: 37328705]
[25]
Sousa da Silva AW, Vranken WF. ACPYPE - AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5(1): 367.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-367] [PMID: 22824207]
[26]
Valdés-Tresanco MS, Valdés-Tresanco ME, Valiente PA, Moreno E. gmx_MMPBSA: A new tool to perform end-state free energy calculations with GROMACS. J Chem Theory Comput 2021; 17(10): 6281-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00645] [PMID: 34586825]
[27]
Lokwani DK, Chavan SR, Sarkate AP, Natarajan PM, Umapathy VR, Jain SP. Virtual screening of natural compounds as potential SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors: A Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation guided approach. Chem Proc 2023; 14: 85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-27-16049]
[28]
Lokwani D, Shah R, Mokale S, Shastry P, Shinde D. Development of energetic pharmacophore for the designing of 1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyrimidine derivatives as selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2012; 26(3): 267-77.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9540-z] [PMID: 22218727]
[29]
Zavodszky MI, Stumpff-Kane AW, Lee DJ, Feig M. Scoring confidence index: Statistical evaluation of ligand binding mode predictions. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2009; 23(5): 289-99.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9258-8] [PMID: 19153808]
[30]
Dankwa B, Broni E, Enninful KS, Kwofie SK, Wilson MD. Consensus docking and MM-PBSA computations identify putative furin protease inhibitors for developing potential therapeutics against COVID-19. Struct Chem 2022; 33(6): 2221-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11224-022-02056-1] [PMID: 36118173]
[31]
Ferreira JC, Fadl S, Villanueva AJ, Rabeh WM. Catalytic dyad residues His41 and Cys145 impact the catalytic activity and overall conformational fold of the main SARS-CoV-2 protease 3-Chymotrypsin-like protease. Front Chem 2021; 9(9): 692168.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.692168] [PMID: 34249864]
[32]
Maity D, Pal D. MD DaVis: Interactive data visualization of protein molecular dynamics. Bioinformatics 2022; 38(12): 3299-301.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac314] [PMID: 35532115]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite