Title:A Retrospective Analysis: CCTA vs. TTE in Diagnosing Coronary Artery Fistula
Volume: 21
Author(s): XiaoLi Hu, Jian Shen, ChunLi He, YueMei Li, Shen Gui, YuKun Cao*, Ping Han*Jun Xu*
Affiliation:
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Precision Radiology & Interventional Medicine, Wuhan 430022, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Keywords:
Cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), Coronary artery fistula (CAF), Imaging diagnosis, Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), Vascular anomaly, Digital subtraction
Abstract:
Objective:
This study aimed to compare and analyze the diagnostic performance of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and transthoracic
echocardiography (TTE) for coronary artery fistula (CAF) and evaluate the effectiveness of these two imaging modalities.
Methods:
We retrospectively collected and analyzed imaging data from 200 patients diagnosed with CAF through surgery or digital subtraction angiography
(DSA). These patients underwent CCTA and TTE examinations in our hospital. Finally, the course, origin, number, size, and location of the CAF
in all patients were assessed. The diagnostic results of CCTA were compared with those of TTE, using DSA and/or surgical diagnosis as the
reference standard.
Results:
Among the 200 patients with CAF, CCTA correctly diagnosed 156 cases, but missed 44 cases, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 78.0%
(156/200). In contrast, TTE accurately diagnosed 55 cases, but missed 145 cases, yielding a diagnostic accuracy of 27.5% (55/200). The diagnostic
accuracy of CCTA was significantly higher than that of TTE in detecting CAF (P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
CCTA demonstrated significantly greater diagnostic value than TTE, demonstrating to be the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing CAF.