Generic placeholder image

Current Probiotics

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2666-6499
ISSN (Online): 2666-6502

Research Article

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus DTA 73 Exhibits Superior Anti-adhesion Activity against Salmonella typhimurium DTA 41 in Caco-2 cells

Author(s): Matheus Rodrigues Silva do Carmo, Gabriella Oliveira Alves Moreira de Carvalho, Rodrigo Batista dos Santos, André Fioravante Guerra, Fabio da Silva de Azevedo Fortes and Rosa Helena Luchese*

Volume 2, 2025

Published on: 17 February, 2025

Article ID: e26666499351834 Pages: 11

DOI: 10.2174/0126666499351834250212051634

Price: $65

Abstract

Introduction: A challenge in choosing probiotic strains is to identify, in each one, specific positive health effects to offer a tailored product. An important health claim of probiotics is the competitive exclusion of pathogens and the consequent prevention and treatment of diarrhea.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of lactobacilli strains to adhere to intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells and to inhibit Salmonella adhesion in vitro and in situ.

Methods: The ability to inhibit Salmonella biofilms by four strains of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, three strains of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, two strains of Limosilactobacillus fermentum, and a commercial strain of Lacticaseibacillus casei, was evaluated in vitro on hydrophobic polystyrene surfaces and in situ using Caco-2 cells.

Results and Discussion: All strains showed a high adhesion capacity to Caco-2 cells, with no significant difference between isolated strains and the commercial probiotic strain. In polystyrene surfaces, inhibition of Salmonella biofilms by lactobacilli through the competition and exclusion mechanisms was significantly more effective when compared to displacement. However, in Caco-2 cells, the isolates were more effective in inhibiting Salmonella biofilms.

Conclusion: It is concluded that hydrophobicity was not a good indicator of adhesion capability. Although all lactobacilli strains have low cell surface hydrophobicity, they showed high adhesion capacity in Caco-2 cells. The most promising strain, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus DTA 73, was able to inhibit Salmonella adhesion in Caco-2 cells by competition, exclusion and displacement with the same efficiency, suggesting that it could be effective not only in preventing but also in treating diarrhea.

Keywords: Lactobacilli, probiotic, biofilm inhibition, in vitro, in situ, CaCo-2 cells.

[1]
Chaudhary, P.P.; Kaur, M.; Myles, I.A. Does “all disease begin in the gut”? The gut-organ cross talk in the microbiome. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2024, 108(1), 339.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-024-13180-9] [PMID: 38771520]
[2]
Hou, K.; Wu, Z.X.; Chen, X.Y. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther., 2022, 7(1), 135.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4] [PMID: 35461318]
[3]
Di Vincenzo, F.; Del Gaudio, A.; Petito, V.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Scaldaferri, F. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: A narrative review. Intern. Emerg. Med., 2024, 19(2), 275-293.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-023-03374-w] [PMID: 37505311]
[4]
Javanshir, N.; Hosseini, G.N.G.; Sadeghi, M. Evaluation of the function of probiotics, emphasizing the role of their binding to the intestinal epithelium in the stability and their effects on the immune system. Biol. Proced. Online, 2021, 23(1), 23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-021-00160-w] [PMID: 34847891]
[5]
Maftei, N.M.; Raileanu, C.R.; Balta, A.A. The potential impact of probiotics on human health: An update on their health-promoting properties. Microorganisms, 2024, 12(2), 234.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12020234] [PMID: 38399637]
[6]
Probiotics in food. Health and nutritional properties and guidelines for evaluation 2002. Available from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/382476b3-4d54-4175-803f-2f26f3526256/content
[7]
García-Santos, J.A.; Nieto-Ruiz, A.; García-Ricobaraza, M.; Cerdó, T.; Campoy, C. Impact of probiotics on the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in the pediatric population. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2023, 24(11), 9427.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119427] [PMID: 37298377]
[8]
Skoufou, M.; Tsigalou, C.; Vradelis, S.; Bezirtzoglou, E. The networked interaction between probiotics and intestine in health and disease: A promising success story. Microorganisms, 2024, 12(1), 194.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010194] [PMID: 38258020]
[9]
Singh, S.; Datta, S.; Narayanan, K.B.; Rajnish, K.N. Bacterial exo-polysaccharides in biofilms: Role in antimicrobial resistance and treatments. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol., 2021, 19(1), 140.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-021-00242-y] [PMID: 34557983]
[10]
Das, T.K.; Pradhan, S.; Chakrabarti, S.; Mondal, K.C.; Ghosh, K. Current status of probiotic and related health benefits. Applied Food Research, 2022, 2(2), 100185.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2022.100185]
[11]
Gieryska M, Szulc-D browska L, Struzik J, Mielcarska MB, Gregorczyk-Zboroch KP. Integrity of the intestinal barrier: The involvement of epithelial cells and microbiota—A mutual relationship. Animals , 2022, 12(2), 145.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12020145] [PMID: 35049768]
[12]
Schären, O.P.; Hapfelmeier, S. Robust microbe immune recognition in the intestinal mucosa. Genes Immun., 2021, 22(5-6), 268-275.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41435-021-00131-x] [PMID: 33958733]
[13]
Aleman, R.S.; Yadav, A. Systematic review of probiotics and their potential for developing functional nondairy foods. Appl. Microbiol., 2023, 4(1), 47-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/applmicrobiol4010004]
[14]
Icer, MA; Özbay, S; Ağagündüz, D The impacts of acidophilic lactic acid bacteria on food and human health: A review of the current knowledge. Foods, 2023, 12(15), 2965.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12152965] [PMID: 37569234]
[15]
Abdul Hakim, B.N.; Xuan, N.J.; Oslan, S.N.H. A comprehensive review of bioactive compounds from lactic acid bacteria: Potential functions as functional food in dietetics and the food industry. Foods, 2023, 12(15), 2850.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12152850] [PMID: 37569118]
[16]
Hossain, M.I.; Mizan, M.F.R.; Ashrafudoulla, M. Inhibitory effects of probiotic potential lactic acid bacteria isolated from kimchi against Listeria monocytogenes biofilm on lettuce, stainless-steel surfaces, and MBEC™ biofilm device. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol., 2020, 118, 108864.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108864]
[17]
Zheng, J.; Wittouck, S.; Salvetti, E. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2020, 70(4), 2782-2858.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107] [PMID: 32293557]
[18]
Guerra, A.F.; Lemos, WJF, Junior; Santos, G.O. Lactobacillus paracasei probiotic properties and survivability under stress-induced by processing and storage of ice cream bar or ice-lolly. Cienc. Rural, 2018, 48(9)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170601]
[19]
Tarrah, A.; da Silva Duarte, V.; de Castilhos, J. Probiotic potential and biofilm inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus casei group strains isolated from infant feces. J. Funct. Foods, 2019, 54, 489-497.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2019.02.004]
[20]
Alizadeh Behbahani, B.; Noshad, M.; Falah, F. Inhibition of Escherichia coli adhesion to human intestinal Caco-2 cells by probiotic candidate Lactobacillus plantarum strain L15. Microb. Pathog., 2019, 136, 103677.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103677] [PMID: 31437574]
[21]
Vasiee, A.; Mortazavi, S.A.; Sankian, M.; Yazdi, F.T.; Mahmoudi, M.; Shahidi, F. Antagonistic activity of recombinant Lactococcus lactis NZ1330 on the adhesion properties of Escherichia coli causing urinary tract infection. Microb. Pathog., 2019, 133, 103547.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103547] [PMID: 31112774]
[22]
Woo, J.; Ahn, J. Probiotic-mediated competition, exclusion and displacement in biofilm formation by food-borne pathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 2013, 56(4), 307-313.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lam.12051] [PMID: 23362863]
[23]
García-Ruiz, A.; González de Llano, D.; Esteban-Fernández, A.; Requena, T.; Bartolomé, B.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. Assessment of probiotic properties in lactic acid bacteria isolated from wine. Food Microbiol., 2014, 44, 220-225.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.06.015] [PMID: 25084666]
[24]
Devi, S.M.; Kurrey, N.K.; Halami, P.M. In vitro anti-inflammatory activity among probiotic Lactobacillus species isolated from fermented foods. J. Funct. Foods, 2018, 47, 19-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.05.036]
[25]
Shinde, T.; Vemuri, R.; Shastri, M.D. Probiotic Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 spores exhibit excellent in-vitro functional efficacy in simulated gastric survival, mucosal adhesion and immunomodulation. J. Funct. Foods, 2019, 52, 100-108.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2018.10.031]
[26]
Bu, X.D.; Li, N.; Tian, X.Q.; Huang, P.L. Caco-2 and LS174T cell lines provide different models for studying mucin expression in colon cancer. Tissue Cell, 2011, 43(3), 201-206.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2011.03.002] [PMID: 21470648]
[27]
Todorov, S.D.; Botes, M.; Guigas, C. Boza, a natural source of probiotic lactic acid bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2008, 104(2), 465-477.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03558.x] [PMID: 17922827]
[28]
Mohanty, D.; Panda, S.; Kumar, S.; Ray, P. In vitro evaluation of adherence and anti-infective property of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum DM 69 against Salmonella enterica. Microb. Pathog., 2019, 126, 212-217.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.11.014] [PMID: 30423346]
[29]
Polak-Berecka, M. Wako A, Paduch R, Skrzypek T, Sroka-Bartnicka A. The effect of cell surface components on adhesion ability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2014, 106(4), 751-762.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0245-x] [PMID: 25090959]
[30]
Rinkinen, M.; Westermarck, E.; Salminen, S.; Ouwehand, A.C. Absence of host specificity for in vitro adhesion of probiotic lactic acid bacteria to intestinal mucus. Vet. Microbiol., 2003, 97(1-2), 55-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(03)00183-4] [PMID: 14637038]
[31]
Gagnon, M.; Zihler Berner, A.; Chervet, N.; Chassard, C.; Lacroix, C. Comparison of the Caco-2, HT-29 and the mucus-secreting HT29-MTX intestinal cell models to investigate Salmonella adhesion and invasion. J. Microbiol. Methods, 2013, 94(3), 274-279.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.06.027] [PMID: 23835135]
[32]
Gandhi, A.; Shah, N.P. Effect of salt stress on morphology and membrane composition of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Bifidobacterium bifidum, and their adhesion to human intestinal epithelial-like Caco-2 cells. J. Dairy Sci., 2016, 99(4), 2594-2605.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10718] [PMID: 26874411]
[33]
Ramiah, K.; van Reenen, C.A.; Dicks, L.M.T. Surface-bound proteins of Lactobacillus plantarum 423 that contribute to adhesion of Caco-2 cells and their role in competitive exclusion and displacement of Clostridium sporogenes and Enterococcus faecalis. Res. Microbiol., 2008, 159(6), 470-475.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2008.06.002] [PMID: 18619532]
[34]
Konieczna, C. Słodziński M, Schmidt MT. Exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus KL 53A and Lactobacillus casei fyos affect their adhesion to enterocytes. Pol. J. Microbiol., 2018, 67(3), 273-281.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21307/pjm-2018-032] [PMID: 30451443]
[35]
Sarikaya, H.; Aslim, B.; Yuksekdag, Z. Assessment of anti-biofilm activity and bifidogenic growth stimulator (BGS) effect of lyophilized exopolysaccharides (l-EPSs) from Lactobacilli strains. Int. J. Food Prop., 2017, 20(2), 362-371.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2016.1160923]
[36]
Yang, Y.; Kong, X.; Niu, B.; Yang, J.; Chen, Q. Differences in biofilm formation of Listeria monocytogenes and their effects on virulence and drug resistance of different strains. Foods, 2024, 13(7), 1076.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods13071076] [PMID: 38611380]
[37]
Oleksy, M.; Klewicka, E. Exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus sp.: Biosynthesis and applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 2016, 58(3), 1-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1187112] [PMID: 27246190]
[38]
Wu, M.H.; Pan, T.M.; Wu, Y.J.; Chang, S.J.; Chang, M.S.; Hu, C.Y. Exopolysaccharide activities from probiotic Bifidobacterium: Immunomodulatory effects (on J774A.1 macrophages) and antimicrobial properties. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 2010, 144(1), 104-110.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.003] [PMID: 20884069]
[39]
Nampoothiri, K.M.; Beena, D.J.; Vasanthakumari, D.S.; Ismail, B. Health benefits of exopolysaccharides in fermented foods. In: Frias JFermented Foods in Health and Disease Prevention; Frias, J.; Martinez-Villaluenga, C.; Peñas, E., Eds.; Academic Press: Boston, 2017, pp. 49-62.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802309-9.00003-0]
[40]
Faghfoori, Z.; Pourghassem Gargari, B.; Saber Gharamaleki, A.; Bagherpour, H.; Yari Khosroushahi, A. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of probiotics effects on colorectal cancer. J. Funct. Foods, 2015, 18, 463-472.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.08.013]
[41]
Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, K.; Zhang, J. Adhesive ability means inhibition activities for Lactobacillus against pathogens and S-layer protein plays an important role in adhesion. Anaerobe, 2013, 22, 97-103.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.06.005] [PMID: 23792230]
[42]
Chen, X.; Xu, J.; Shuai, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Fang, W. The S-layer proteins of Lactobacillus crispatus strain ZJ001 is responsible for competitive exclusion against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 2007, 115(3), 307-312.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.11.007] [PMID: 17289201]
[43]
Hardy, H.; Harris, J.; Lyon, E.; Beal, J.; Foey, A. Probiotics, prebiotics and immunomodulation of gut mucosal defences: homeostasis and immunopathology. Nutrients, 2013, 5(6), 1869-1912.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu5061869] [PMID: 23760057]
[44]
Casey, P.G.; Gardiner, G.E.; Casey, G. A five-strain probiotic combination reduces pathogen shedding and alleviates disease signs in pigs challenged with Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2007, 73(6), 1858-1863.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01840-06] [PMID: 17261517]
[45]
Tuo, Y.; Song, X.; Song, Y. Screening probiotics from Lactobacillus strains according to their abilities to inhibit pathogen adhesion and induction of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-8. J. Dairy Sci., 2018, 101(6), 4822-4829.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13654] [PMID: 29550135]
[46]
Wang, B.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Huang, Q.; Li, N.; Li, J. Effect of live Lactobacillus plantarum L2 on TNF induced MCP-1 production in Caco-2 cells. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 2010, 142(1-2), 237-241.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.05.024] [PMID: 20576301]
[47]
Abramov, V.M.; Kosarev, I.V.; Priputnevich, T.V. S-layer protein 2 of Lactobacillus crispatus 2029, its structural and immunomodulatory characteristics and roles in protective potential of the whole bacteria against foodborne pathogens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2020, 150, 400-412.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.065] [PMID: 32045605]
[48]
Zhang, Z.; Tao, X.; Shah, N.P.; Wei, H. Antagonistics against pathogenic Bacillus cereus in milk fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY2013 and its anti-adhesion effect on Caco-2 cells against pathogens. J. Dairy Sci., 2016, 99(4), 2666-2674.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10587] [PMID: 26830743]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2026 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy