Generic placeholder image

Recent Patents on Nanotechnology

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1872-2105
ISSN (Online): 2212-4020

Review Article

A Review on the Upgradation of Biomass-derived Hard Carbon Materials

Author(s): Tengrui Wang, Ruyan Li*, Qian Liu and Weichi Liu

Volume 19, Issue 2, 2025

Published on: 06 March, 2024

Page: [257 - 269] Pages: 13

DOI: 10.2174/0118722105287471240221094548

Price: $65

Abstract

Sodium-ion battery is a promising alternative to lithium-ion battery because of its abundant raw material resources, low price, and high specific capacity. Amorphous carbon materials (hard carbon) have micropores and impurities, facilitating the intercalation of sodium ions to form "quasi-metallic sodium," resulting in a high sodium storage capacity and a low sodium storage potential. Consequently, hard carbon is one of the most widely studied negative electrode materials. It can be prepared from biomass by thermochemical conversion and has the advantages of large specific capacity, low cost, good cycling stability, and renewability. This review focuses on Patents and thesis research in the hard carbon materials based on biomass. Firstly, the preparation methods of hard carbon, including precursor selection, pretreatment, drying methods, and carbonization processes, are summarized. Secondly, the effects of precursor composition and heteroatom doping structure and properties of hard carbon are examined, and the changes in carbon material pores during the activation process, as well as the selection of optimal drying method, pyrolysis temperature, carbonization temperature, activator dosage, and additive, are discussed. Thirdly, the impact of preparation methods on hard carbon's cost, efficiency, and stability is briefly summarized, and the relevant improvement measures and prospects are proposed. Finally, some insights are provided into preparing high-performance biomass-based anode materials for sodium-ion batteries.

Keywords: Biomass-derived hard carbon, precursor, modification, carbonization, sodium storage, sodium-ion batteries.

[1]
Armaroli N, Balzani V. The future of energy supply: Challenges and opportunities. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007; 46(1-2): 52-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200602373] [PMID: 17103469]
[2]
Sarma DD, Shukla AK. Building better batteries: A travel back in time. ACS Energy Lett 2018; 3(11): 2841-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01966]
[3]
Armand M, Tarascon JM. Building better batteries. Nature 2008; 451(7179): 652-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/451652a] [PMID: 18256660]
[4]
Turcheniuk K, Bondarev D, Singhal V, Yushin G. Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries. Nature 2018; 559(7715): 467-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05752-3] [PMID: 30046087]
[5]
Jin C, Nai J, Sheng O, et al. Biomass-based materials for green lithium secondary batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2021; 14(3): 1326-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0EE02848G]
[6]
Yabuuchi N, Kubota K, Dahbi M, Komaba S. Research development on sodium-ion batteries. Chem Rev 2014; 114(23): 11636-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr500192f] [PMID: 25390643]
[7]
Hou H, Qiu X, Wei W, Zhang Y, Ji X. Carbon anode materials for advanced sodium‐ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2017; 7(24): 1602898.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201602898]
[8]
Lijing X, Cheng T, Zhihong B. Hard carbon anodes for next‐generation li‐ion batteries: Review and perspective. Adv Energy Mater 2021; 11(38): 2101650.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202101650]
[9]
Yuan H, Liu T, Liu Y, et al. A review of biomass materials for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Sci 2019; 10(32): 7484-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9SC02743B] [PMID: 31768234]
[10]
Wei N, Lingying S. Review Article: Layer-structured carbonaceous materials for advanced Li-ion and Na-ion batteries: Beyond graphene. J Vac Sci Technol A 2019; 37: 040803 .
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.5095413]
[11]
Jie ZHANG, Rongshuai DUAN, Zijiang LI, et al. Research advances on biomass derived carbon aerogel. Biomass Chem Eng 2021; 55(1): 91-100.
[12]
Chen D, Cen K, Zhuang X, et al. Insight into biomass pyrolysis mechanism based on cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin: Evolution of volatiles and kinetics, elucidation of reaction pathways, and characterization of gas, biochar and bio‐oil. Combust Flame 2022; 242: 112142.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112142]
[13]
Dou X, Hasa I, Hekmatfar M, et al. Pectin, hemicellulose, or lignin? impact of the biowaste source on the performance of hard carbons for sodium‐ion batteries. ChemSusChem 2017; 10(12): 2668-76.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201700628] [PMID: 28425668]
[14]
Feng Y, Tao L, He Y, et al. Chemical-enzymatic fractionation to unlock the potential of biomass-derived carbon materials for sodium ion batteries. J Mater Chem A Mater Energy Sustain 2019; 7(47): 26954-65.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9TA09124F]
[15]
Adrian B, et al. Impact of biomass inorganic impurities on hard carbon properties and performance in Na-ion batteries. Sustainable Mater Technol 2020; 26: e00227.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00227]
[16]
Lu B, Lin C, Xiong H, et al. Hard-carbon negative electrodes from biomasses for sodium-ion batteries. Molecules 2023; 28(10): 4027.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28104027] [PMID: 37241775]
[17]
Chu Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, et al. Reconfiguring hard carbons with emerging sodium‐ion batteries: A perspective. Adv Mater 2023; 35(31): 2212186.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.202212186] [PMID: 36806260]
[18]
Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 2007; 86(12-13): 1781-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013]
[19]
Bommier C, Ji X. Recent development on anodes for na‐ion batteries. Isr J Chem 2015; 55(5): 486-507.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201400118]
[20]
Dichao WU, Chao CHEN, Xinglong HOU, Kang SUN. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on structures of chars forming from cellulose and lignin. Biomass Chem Eng 2021; 55(3): 1-9.
[21]
Wu XS, Dong XL, Wang BY, Xia JL, Li WC. Revealing the sodium storage behavior of biomass-derived hard carbon by using pure lignin and cellulose as model precursors. Renew Energy 2022; 189: 630-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.023]
[22]
Rios C, Simonin L, Ghimbeu CM, Vaulot C, da Silva Perez D, Dupont C. Impact of the biomass precursor composition in the hard carbon properties and performance for application in a Na-ion battery. Fuel Process Technol 2022; 231: 107223.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107223]
[23]
Gou W, Kong X, Wang Y, et al. Yolk-shell structured V2O3 microspheres wrapped in N, S co-doped carbon as pea-pod nanofibers for high-capacity lithium ion batteries. Chem Eng J 2019; 374: 545-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.144]
[24]
Zhu Z, Liang F, Zhou Z, et al. Expanded biomass-derived hard carbon with ultra-stable performance in sodium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A Mater Energy Sustain 2018; 6(4): 1513-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7TA07951F]
[25]
Xue X, Weng Y, Jiang Z, et al. Naturally nitrogen-doped porous carbon derived from waste crab shell as anode material for high performance sodium-ion battery. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2021; 157: 105215.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105215]
[26]
Li Y, Wang Z, Li L, et al. Preparation of nitrogen- and phosphorous co-doped carbon microspheres and their superior performance as anode in sodium-ion batteries. Carbon 2016; 99: 556-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.066]
[27]
Li Z, Bommier C, Chong ZS, et al. Mechanism of na‐ion storage in hard carbon anodes revealed by heteroatom doping. Adv Energy Mater 2017; 7(18): 1602894.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201602894]
[28]
Ji W, Hu L, Hu X, Ding Y, Wen Z. Nitrogen-doped carbon coating mesoporous ZnS nanospheres as high-performance anode material of sodium-ion batteries. Mater Today Commun 2019; 19: 396-401.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.03.008]
[29]
Aristote NT, et al. Sulfur-doping biomass based hard carbon as high performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. J Electroanal Chem 2022; 923: 116769.
[30]
Agrawal A, Janakiraman S, Biswas K, Venimadhav A, Srivastava SK, Ghosh S. Understanding the improved electrochemical performance of nitrogen-doped hard carbons as an anode for sodium ion battery. Electrochim Acta 2019; 317: 164-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.05.158]
[31]
Hou H, Shao L, Zhang Y, Zou G, Chen J, Ji X. Large‐area carbon nanosheets doped with phosphorus: A high‐performance anode material for sodium‐ion batteries. Adv Sci 2017; 4(1): 1600243.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600243] [PMID: 28105399]
[32]
Jin Q, Li W, Wang K, et al. Experimental design and theoretical calculation for sulfur-doped carbon nanofibers as a high performance sodium-ion battery anode. J Mater Chem A Mater Energy Sustain 2019; 7(17): 10239-45.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C9TA02107H]
[33]
Zhao G, Yu D, Zhang H, et al. Sulphur-doped carbon nanosheets derived from biomass as high-performance anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2020; 67: 104219.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104219]
[34]
Wan H, Shen X, Jiang H, et al. Biomass-derived N/S dual-doped porous hard-carbon as high-capacity anodes for lithium/sodium ions batteries. Energy 2021; 231: 121102.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121102]
[35]
Yenduri BR, Saisrinu Y, Soumen K, Kamala BK, Patro LN. Nitrogen doped soap-nut seeds derived hard carbon as an efficient anode material for na-ion batteries. J Alloys Compd 2023; 968: 171917.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171917]
[36]
Zhao Yanhong, Hu Zhuang, Fan Changling, et al. Novel structural design and adsorption/insertion coordinating quasi-metallic na storage mechanism toward high-performance hard carbon anode derived from carboxymethyl cellulose. Small 2023; 19: e2303296.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smll.202303296]
[37]
Yan M, Qin Y, Wang L, et al. Recent advances in biomass-derived carbon materials for sodium-ion energy storage devices. Nanomaterials 2022; 12(6): 930.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12060930] [PMID: 35335746]
[38]
Jeon JW, Zhang L, Lutkenhaus JL, et al. Controlling porosity in lignin-derived nanoporous carbon for supercapacitor applications. ChemSusChem 2015; 8(3): 428-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201402621] [PMID: 25339600]
[39]
Pallarés J, González-Cencerrado A, Arauzo I. Production and characterization of activated carbon from barley straw by physical activation with carbon dioxide and steam Biomass and Bioenergy 2018; 115: 64-73.
[40]
Gong Y, Li D, Luo C, Fu Q, Pan C. Highly porous graphitic biomass carbon as advanced electrode materials for supercapacitors. Green Chem 2017; 19(17): 4132-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7GC01681F]
[41]
Wang J, Li Q, Liu Y, et al. Fast and highly efficient removal of lignin from amorphous cornstalks via sulfuric acid-catalyzed hydrolysis for the production of fermentable sugars. Bioresour Technol 2019; 272: 551-8.
[42]
Cheng XR, Wang JY, Liu YP, et al. High-yield and high-quality activated carbons from para-xylene manufacturing residues by H2SO4 activation. Fuel Process Technol 2014; 124: 1-6.
[43]
Chen C, Wei T, Li B, et al. Activated carbons with high adsorption performance from phosphoric acid activation of biomass wastes. ACS Sustain Chem& Eng 2019; 7(10): 9371-81.
[44]
Nurdiawati A, Hamdan S, Arifin MKB, et al. H3PO4 activation of biochar from Elais Guineensis shell: Characterization and adsorption abilities. Adv Nat Appl Sci 2013; 7(7): 599-605.
[45]
Garcìa AC, Garcìa AC, Vicente FM, et al. Obtaining activated carbons from agricultural byproducts by KOH activation. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2008; 81(1): 95-101.
[46]
Leng L, Yuan Z, Li X, et al. NaOH activation of swine-manure-derived biochar for phosphate removal. Sci Total Environ 2019; 695: 133667.
[47]
Aslam U, Aslam Z, Ashraf M, Kamal MS. Influence of pretreatments on the fuel properties and pyrolytic kinetics of biomass. Biomass Convers Biorefin 2023; 13(18): 16955-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02235-w]
[48]
Dou X, Hasa I, Saurel D, et al. Impact of the acid treatment on lignocellulosic biomass hard carbon for sodium‐ion battery anodes. ChemSusChem 2018; 11(18): 3276-85.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201801148] [PMID: 29961979]
[49]
Bensouda H, Hakim C, Aziam H, Bacaoui A, Saadoune I. Effect of NaOH impregnation on the electrochemical performances of hard carbon derived from olive seeds biomass for sodium ion batteries. Mater Today Proc 2022; 51: 2066-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.337]
[50]
Yuan M, Que H, Yang X, Li M. Nitrogen and oxygen co-doped glucose-based carbon materials with enhanced electrochemical performances as supercapacitors. Ionics 2019; 25(9): 4305-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11581-019-02964-z]
[51]
Lü F, Lu X, Li S, Zhang H, Shao L, He P. Dozens-fold improvement of biochar redox properties by KOH activation. Chem Eng J 2022; 429: 132203.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132203]
[52]
Anu , Kumar A, Rapoport A, et al. Multifarious pretreatment strategies for the lignocellulosic substrates for the generation of renewable and sustainable biofuels: A review. Renew Energy 2020; 160: 1228-52.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.031]
[53]
Borghei SA, Zare MH, Ahmadi M, et al. Synthesis of multi-application activated carbon from oak seeds by KOH activation for methylene blue adsorption and electrochemical supercapacitor electrode. Arab J Chem 2021; 14(2): 102958.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.102958]
[54]
Yuliusman Y, Nasruddin N, Afdhol MK, et al. Production of activated carbon from coffee grounds using chemical and physical activation method. Adv Sci Lett 2017; 23(6): 5751-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.8822]
[55]
Khan A, Senthil RA, Pan J, Osman S, Sun Y, Shu X. A new biomass derived rod-like porous carbon from tea-waste as inexpensive and sustainable energy material for advanced supercapacitor application. Electrochim Acta 2020; 335: 135588.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135588]
[56]
Jawad AH, Saud Abdulhameed A, Wilson LD, Syed-Hassan SSA, ALOthman ZA, Rizwan Khan M. High surface area and mesoporous activated carbon from KOH-activated dragon fruit peels for methylene blue dye adsorption: Optimization and mechanism study. Chin J Chem Eng 2021; 32: 281-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2020.09.070]
[57]
Xie L, Tang C, Song M, et al. Molecular-scale controllable conversion of biopolymers into hard carbons towards lithium and sodium ion batteries: A review. J Energy Chem 2022; 72: 554-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.05.006]
[58]
Liu D, Zhang G, Gui K, Wang M, Zhu M, Bao Y. Effects of drying process on the microstructure and properties of biomass-derived porous carbon material. Ceram Int 2022; 48(14): 21043-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.123]
[59]
Meng F, Wang D. Effects of vacuum freeze drying pretreatment on biomass and biochar properties. Renew Energy 2020; 155: 1-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.113]
[60]
Baldinelli A, Dou X, Buchholz D, Marinaro M, Passerini S, Barelli L. Addressing the energy sustainability of biowaste-derived hard carbon materials for battery electrodes. Green Chem 2018; 20(7): 1527-37.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8GC00085A]
[61]
Caballero JA, Conesa JA, Font R, Marcilla A. Pyrolysis kinetics of almond shells and olive stones considering their organic fractions. J Anal Appl Pyrol 2021; 42(2): 159-75.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(97)00015-6]
[62]
White JE, Catallo WJ, Legendre BL. Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: A comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2011; 91(1): 1-33.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.01.004]
[63]
Yaashikaa PR, Kumar PS, Varjani S, Saravanan A. A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy. Biotechnol Rep 2020; 28: e00570.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570] [PMID: 33304842]
[64]
Li L, Rowbotham J S, Christopher Greenwell H, Dyer P W. New and future developments in catalysis. Elsevier 2013; pp. 173-208.
[65]
Demirbaş A. Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Convers Manage 2001; 42(11): 1357-78.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(00)00137-0]
[66]
Chen Y, Zhang X, Chen W, Yang H, Chen H. The structure evolution of biochar from biomass pyrolysis and its correlation with gas pollutant adsorption performance. Bioresour Technol 2017; 246: 101-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.138] [PMID: 28893501]
[67]
Kan T, Strezov V, Evans TJ. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: A review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016; 57: 1126-40.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185]
[68]
Muzyka R, Misztal E, Hrabak J, Banks SW, Sajdak M. Various biomass pyrolysis conditions influence the porosity and pore size distribution of biochar. Energy 2023; 263: 126128.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126128]
[69]
Khan TA, Saud AS, Jamari SS, Rahim MHA, Park J-W, Kim H-J. Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for carbon rich material preparation: A review. Biomass Bioenergy 2019; 130: 105384.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105384]
[70]
Iurchenkova A, Kobets A, Ahaliabadeh Z, et al. The effect of the pyrolysis temperature and biomass type on the biocarbons characteristics. ChemSusChem 2024; 17(8): e202301005.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202301005] [PMID: 38126627]
[71]
Jung D, Zimmermann M, Kruse A. Hydrothermal carbonization of fructose: Growth mechanism and kinetic model. ACS Sustain Chem& Eng 2018; 6(11): 13877-87.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02118]
[72]
Correa C, Hehr T, Voglhuber-Slavinsky A, Rauscher Y, Kruse A. Pyrolysis vs. hydrothermal carbonization: Understanding the effect of biomass structural components and inorganic compounds on the char properties. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2019; 140: 137-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.03.007]
[73]
Kun-lei H, Long DG, Han CW. Biomass-derived hard carbon is used as a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2014; 2: 12733-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4TA02068E]
[74]
Kim K, Lim DG, Han CW, et al. Tailored carbon anodes derived from biomass for sodium-ion storage. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2017; 5(10): 8720-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01497]
[75]
Chen C, Huang Y, Meng Z, et al. Insight into the rapid sodium storage mechanism of the fiber-like oxygen-doped hierarchical porous biomass derived hard carbon. J Colloid Interface Sci 2021; 588: 657-69.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.11.058] [PMID: 33261818]
[76]
Zhang Y, Li X, Dong P, et al. Honeycomb-like hard carbon derived from pine pollen as high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018; 10(49): 42796-803.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b13160] [PMID: 30461257]
[77]
Wang Y, Feng Z, Zhu W, et al. High capacity and high efficiency maple tree-biomass-derived hard carbon as an anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Materials 2018; 11(8): 1294.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11081294] [PMID: 30050008]
[78]
Ou J, Yang L, Zhang Z. Chrysanthemum derived hierarchically porous nitrogen-doped carbon as high performance anode material for Lithium/Sodium ion batteries. Powder Technol 2019; 344: 89-95.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.11.100]
[79]
Wang Jing, et al. Facile hydrothermal treatment route of reed straw-derived hard carbon for high-performance sodium-ion battery. Electrochim Acta 2018; 291: 188-96.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.136]
[80]
Zheng P, Liu T, Guo S. Micro-nano structure hard carbon as a high performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Sci Rep 2016; 6(1): 35620.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35620] [PMID: 27752146]
[81]
Wei H, Cheng H, Yao N, et al. Invasive alien plant biomass-derived hard carbon anode for sodium-ion batteries. Chemosphere 2023; 343: 140220.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140220] [PMID: 37739130]
[82]
Liu F, Zhao P, Zhao J. Research progress of hard carbon anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Science and Technology 2022; 11: p. (11)3497.
[83]
Dou X, Hasa I, Saurel D, et al. Hard carbons for sodium-ion batteries: Structure, analysis, sustainability, and electrochemistry. Mater Today 2019; 23: 87-104.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.040]
[84]
Marsh H, Crawford D. Structure in graphitizable carbon from coal-tar pitch HTT 750–1148 K. Studied using high resolution electron microscopy. In: Carbon 1984; 22(4-5): 413-22.
[85]
Franklin RE. Crystallite growth in graphitizing and non-graphitizing carbons. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 1951; 209(1097): 196-218.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1951.0197]
[86]
Cheng F, Bayat H, Jena U, Brewer CE. Impact of feedstock composition on pyrolysis of low-cost, protein- and lignin-rich biomass: A review. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2020; 147: 104780.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104780]
[87]
Wang Jun, et al. Controllable synthesis of bifunctional porous carbon for efficient gas-mixture separation and high-performance supercapacitor. J Chem Eng 2018; 348: 57-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.188]
[88]
Han Y, Gholizadeh M, Tran C-C, et al. Hydrotreatment of pyrolysis bio-oil: A review. Fuel Process Technol 2019; 195: 106140.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106140]
[89]
Yang Q, Wang X, Luo W, et al. Effectiveness and mechanisms of phosphate adsorption on iron-modified biochars derived from waste activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 2018; 247: 537-44.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.136] [PMID: 28972907]
[90]
Titirici MM, Thomas A, Yu S-H, Müller J-O, Antonietti M. A direct synthesis of mesoporous carbons with bicontinuous pore morphology from crude plant material by hydrothermal carbonization. Chem Mater 2007; 19(17): 4205-12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm0707408]
[91]
Barker J, Meysami SS, Mazzali F, Rennie A. Process for preparing and use of hard-carbon containing materials. US Patent US20220190338A1, 2022.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2026 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy