Generic placeholder image

Current Materials Science

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2666-1454
ISSN (Online): 2666-1462

Mini-Review Article

Rheology Assessment of Mortar Materials for Additive Manufacturing

Author(s): Ana Pedrosa* and Florindo Gaspar

Volume 17, Issue 4, 2024

Published on: 18 August, 2023

Page: [304 - 320] Pages: 17

DOI: 10.2174/2666145417666230801093723

Price: $65

Abstract

This review article discusses the relevant rheological tests to evaluate the properties of compositions applied to the 3D printing of concrete (3DCP). These materials must rapidly develop rigidity and resistance, avoiding the collapse of the printed structure, with suitable buildability and other state properties, such as extrudability. A good balance must be maintained between properties and rheological parameters, such as yield stress and viscosity. Cohesion, Young's modulus, and thixotropy are also among the parameters used in these evaluations. The rheological tests addressed are the rheometer, direct shear test, uniaxial unconfined compression test, and penetration test. Their limitations must be taken into account to obtain accurate values of the rheological parameters. It was found that the most used test is the rheometer, and the test that needs to be further studied is the penetration test. Hence, it is recommended to search for a more expeditious method related to the rheological assessment to facilitate obtaining the associated parameters in a simple way.

Keywords: 3D printing, construction, yield stress, flow table test, rheometer, direct shear test, unconfined uniaxial compression test, penetration test.

Graphical Abstract
[1]
Valente M, Sibai A, Sambucci M. Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of concrete products: Revolutionizing and remodeling the construction industry. J Compos Sci 2019; 3(3): 88.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcs3030088]
[2]
Wolfs RJM, Bos FP, Salet TAM. Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed concrete: Numerical modelling and experimental testing. Cement Concr Res 2018; 106: 103-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.001]
[3]
Ranjan Prem P, Ravichandran D, Kumar Kaliyavaradhan S, Ambily PS. Comparative evaluation of rheological models for 3D printable concrete. Mater Today Proc 2022; 65: 1594-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.555]
[4]
Jo JH, Jo BW, Cho W, Kim JH. Development of a 3D Printer for Concrete Structures: Laboratory Testing of Cementitious Materials. Int J Concr Struct Mater 2020; 14(1): 13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0388-2]
[5]
Moeini MA, Hosseinpoor M, Yahia A. Yield stress of fine cement-based mortars: Challenges and potentials with rotational and compressional testing methods. Constr Build Mater 2022; 314: 125691.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125691]
[6]
du Plessis A, Babafemi AJ, Paul SC, Panda B, Tran JP, Broeckhoven C. Biomimicry for 3D concrete printing: A review and perspective. Additive Manufacturing. Elsevier B.V. 2021; Vol. 38.
[7]
Zhou X, Li Z, Fan M, Chen H. Rheology of semi-solid fresh cement pastes and mortars in orifice extrusion. Cement Concr Compos 2013; 37(1): 304-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.004]
[8]
Batikha M, Jotangia R, Baaj MY, Mousleh I. 3D concrete printing for sustainable and economical construction: A comparative study. Autom Constr 2022; 134: 104087.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104087]
[9]
Guamán-Rivera R, Martínez-Rocamora A, García-Alvarado R, Muñoz-Sanguinetti C, González-Böhme LF, Auat-Cheein F. Recent Developments and Challenges of 3D-Printed Construction: A Review of Research Fronts. Buildings. MDPI 2022; Vol. 12.
[10]
Almeshal I, Al-Tayeb MM, Qaidi SMA, Abu Bakar BH, Tayeh BA. Mechanical properties of eco-friendly cements-based glass powder in aggressive medium. Mater Today Proc 2022; 58: 1582-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.613]
[11]
Qaidi S, Najm HM, Abed SM, et al. Concrete Containing Waste Glass as an Environmentally Friendly Aggregate: A Review on Fresh and Mechanical Characteristics. Materials. MDPI 2022; Vol. 15.
[12]
Chidiac SE, Mahmoodzadeh F. Constitutive flow models for characterizing the rheology of fresh mortar and concrete. Can J Civ Eng 2013; 40(5): 475-82.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/L2012-025]
[13]
Ravichandran D, Giridhar G. kumar Ramamurthy V, Ranjan Prem P. Influence of test protocol on determining the rheological properties of cement pastes mixtures for concrete 3D printing. Mater Today Proc 2023.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.145]
[15]
Koehler EP, Fowler DW. Development of a portable rheometer for fresh Portland cement concrete sponsored by the aggregates foundation for technology, research and education. Available from 2004. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/35338/105-3F_completed.pdf?sequence=2
[16]
Sustainability Li Z, Hojati M, Wu Z, et al. Fresh and hardened properties of extrusion-based 3D-printed cementitious materials: A review. Sustainability 2020; 12(14): 5628.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12145628]
[17]
Gołaszewski J, Cygan G, Piotr Drewniok M, et al. The influence of composition on thixotropic behaviour of cement mortar. 2014. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310084807
[18]
Jayathilakage R, Sanjayan J, Rajeev P. Direct shear test for the assessment of rheological parameters of concrete for 3D printing applications. Mater Struct 2019; 52: 12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1322-4]
[19]
Omran AF, Naji S, Khayat KH. Portable vane test to assess structural buildup at rest of self-consolidating concrete. Aci Mater J 2011; 108(M67): 628-37.
[20]
Banfill PFG. Rheological methods for assessing the flow properties of mortar and related materials. Constr Build Mater 1994; 8(1): 43-50.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(94)90007-8]
[21]
Banfill PFG. The rheology of fresh cement and concrete-A review. Proc 11th International Cement Chemistry Congress. Durban, SA. 2003.
[22]
Long WJ, Tao JL, Lin C, et al. Rheology and buildability of sustainable cement-based composites containing micro-crystalline cellulose for 3D-printing. J Clean Prod 2019; 118054: 239.
[23]
Saruhan V, Keskinateş M, Felekoğlu B. A comprehensive review on fresh state rheological properties of extrusion mortars designed for 3D printing applications. Constr Build Mater 2022; 337: 127629.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127629]
[24]
Krishnaraja AR, Guru KV. 3D Printing Concrete: A Review. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng
[25]
Nerella VN, Mechtcherine V. Studying the Printability of Fresh Concrete for Formwork-Free Concrete Onsite 3D Printing Technology (CONPrint3D) In: 3D Concrete Printing Technology. Elsevier 2019; pp. 333-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815481-6.00016-6]
[26]
Rahul AV, Santhanam M, Meena H, Ghani Z. 3D printable concrete: Mixture design and test methods. Cement Concr Compos 2019; 97: 13-23.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.014]
[27]
Ma G, Li Z, Wang L. Printable properties of cementitious material containing copper tailings for extrusion based 3D printing. Constr Build Mater 2018; 162: 613-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.051]
[28]
Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, Buswell RA, Gibb AGF, Thorpe T. Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Mater Struct 2012; 45: 1221-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z]
[29]
Nicolas R, Richard B, Nicolas D, et al. Assessing the fresh properties of printable cement-based materials: High potential tests for quality control. Cement Concr Res 2022; 158: 106836.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106836]
[30]
Alfani R, Guerrini GL. Rheological test methods for the characterization of extrudable cement-based materials - A review. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions 2005; Vol. 38: 239-47.
[31]
Secure your competitive advantage with ISO 27001. British Standards Institution, European Committee for Standardization 2007. Available from: https://qms-beratungen.de/din-iso-27001-isms-bsi-beratung-zertifizierung/?gad=1gclid=CjwKCAjwge2iBhBBEiwAfXDBR5DkFgv33ZzSTbRHMi1vV4ZjQckbRO8hmGo9ghbvnZuv3qcj90iwIhoC7XAQAvD_BwE
[32]
Zhang C, Hou Z, Chen C, Zhang Y, Mechtcherine V, Sun Z. Design of 3D printable concrete based on the relationship between flow-ability of cement paste and optimum aggregate content. Cement Concr Compos 2019; 104: 103406.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103406]
[33]
ASTM. C 230 / C 230 M Standard Specification for Flow Table for Use in Tests of Hydraulic Cement 1. 2003.
[34]
Tay YWD, Qian Y, Tan MJ. Printability region for 3D concrete printing using slump and slump flow test. Compos, Part B Eng 2019; 174: 106968.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106968]
[35]
Methods of test for mortar for masonry Part 6 Determination of bulk density of fresh mortar. British Standards Institution 1999.
[36]
Rheology using the ICAR plus-An introduction. German Instruments 1999. Available from: http://s1069971.instanturl.net/teststaging.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Rheology-ICAR-Plus-Introduction.pdf
[37]
Benamara A, Pierre A, Kaci A, Melinge Y. 3D Printing of a Cement-Based Mortar in a Complex Fluid Suspension: Analytical Modeling and Experimental Tests.RILEM Bookseries. Springer 2020; pp. 768-77.
[38]
Ferrara L, Cremonesi M, Tregger N, Frangi A, Shah SP. On the identification of rheological properties of cement suspensions: Rheometry, Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling and field test measurements. Cement Concr Res 2012; 42(8): 1134-46.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.05.007]
[39]
Perrot A, Rangeard D, Pierre A. Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques. Mater Struct 2016; 39: 1213-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0571-0]
[40]
Polymer modified bitumen : properties and characterisation. Woodhead Pub 2011.
[41]
Rheometry of pastes, suspensions, and granular materials : applications in industry and environment. Wiley 2005.
[42]
Assaad JJ, Harb J, Maalouf Y. Measurement of yield stress of cement pastes using the direct shear test. J Non-Newt Fluid Mech 2014; 214: 18-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.10.009]
[43]
Jayathilakage R, Sanjayan J, Rajeev P. Comparison of Rheology Measurement Techniques Used in 3D Concrete Printing Applications. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH 2021; pp. 261-73.
[44]
Wang K, Khayat KH. Investigation into yield behavior of fresh cement paste: Model and experiment. Aci Mater J 2010; 107(1): 12-9.
[45]
Tavangar T, Hosseinpoor M, Yahia A, Khayat KH. Novel tri-viscous model to simulate pumping of flowable concrete through characterization of lubrication layer and plug zones. Cement Concr Compos 2022; 126: 104370.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104370]
[46]
Ivanova I, Ivaniuk E, Bisetti S, Nerella VN, Mechtcherine V. 2021.www.preprints.org
[47]
Panda B, Lim JH, Tan MJ. Mechanical properties and deformation behaviour of early age concrete in the context of digital construction. Compos, Part B Eng 2019; 165: 563-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.040]
[48]
Jayathilakage R, Rajeev P, Sanjayan J. Rheometry for Concrete 3D Printing: A Review and an Experimental Comparison. Buildings 2022; 12(8): 1190.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081190]
[49]
Feys D, Cepuritis R, Jacobsen S, Lesage K, Secrieru E, Yahia A. Measuring rheological properties of cement pastes: Most common techniques, procedures and challenges. RILEM Tech Lett 2017; 2: 129-35.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2017.43]
[50]
Jayathilakage R, Rajeev P, Sanjayan JG. Yield stress criteria to assess the buildability of 3D concrete printing. Constr Build Mater 2020; 240: 117989.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117989]
[51]
Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions (Withdrawn 2020). 2020. Available from: https://www.astm.org/d3080_d3080m-11.html
[52]
Pott U, Wolf C, Petryna Y, Stephan D. Evaluation of the unconfined uniaxial compression test to study the evolution of apparent printable mortar properties during the early age transition regime. Cement Concr Res 2022; 161: 106956.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106956]
[53]
Panda B, Noor Mohamed NA, Paul SC, Bhagath Singh GVP, Tan MJ, Šavija B. The effect of material fresh properties and process parameters on buildability and interlayer adhesion of 3D printed concrete. Materials (Basel) 2019; 12(13): 2149.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12132149] [PMID: 31277393]
[54]
Reiter L. Structural Build-up for Digital Fabrication with Concrete-Materials, Methods and Processes.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000456199]
[55]
Reiter L. Structural Build-up for Digital Fabrication with Concrete-Materials, Methods and Processes.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000456199]
[56]
Bos FP, Kruger PJ, Lucas SS, van Zijl GPAG. Juxtaposing fresh material characterisation methods for buildability assessment of 3D printable cementitious mortars. Cement Concr Compos 2021; 120: 104024.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104024]
[57]
Casagrande L, Esposito L, Menna C, Asprone D, Auricchio F. Effect of testing procedures on buildability properties of 3D-printable concrete. Constr Build Mater 2020; 245: 118286.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118286]
[58]
Jousset P, Lootens D, Roussel N, Flatt RJ. Rheology of penetrations tests I: Theory and finite element simulations. Available from: https://iccc-online.org/fileadmin/gruppen/iccc/proceedings/12/pdf/fin00323.pdf
[59]
Lootens D, Jousset P, Martinie L, Roussel N, Flatt RJ. Yield stress during setting of cement pastes from penetration tests. Cement Concr Res 2009; 39(5): 401-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.012]
[60]
Tanabe TA, Sakata K, Mihashi H, et al. Creep, Shrinkage and Durability Mechanics of concrete and concrete structures. Two Volume Set Proceedings of the CONCREEP 8 conference held in Ise-Shima.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy