Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials

ISSN: 1574-8871

Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials
Volume 1, Number 1, January 2006


Contents



Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Pp. 1-13
Giulio Metro, Giovanna Finocchiaro, Luca Toschi, Stefania Bartolini, Elisabetta Magrini, Alessandra Cancellieri, Rocco Trisolini, Luciano Castaldini, Giovanni Tallini, Lucio Crino and Federico Cappuzzo
[Abstract]  [Full Text Article]


Recent Clinical Trials of Cladribine in Hematological Malignancies and Autoimmune Disorders Pp. 15-34
Tadeusz Robak, Agnieszka Wierzbowska and Ewa Robak
[Abstract]  [Full Text Article]


Medical Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: State of the Art and Future Perspectives Pp. 35-42
Gaetano Apice, Amalia Milano, Giovanni Salvatore Bruni, Rosario Vincenzo Iaffaioli and Francesco Caponigro
[Abstract]  [Full Text Article]


Combined Modality Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme: The Role of Temozolomide Pp. 43-51
Carsten Nieder, Markus Adam and Anca L. Grosu
[Abstract]  [Full Text Article]


Topical Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: Current and Evolving Therapies Pp. 53-60
Jeffrey M. Weinberg
[Abstract]  [Full Text Article]


The Development of Future Research Strategies from Reviewing Antiemetic Trials for Chemotherapy Induced Emesis Pp. 61-66
Ian N. Olver
[Abstract]  [Full Text Article]


Clinical Benefit of Idiotype Vaccines: Too Many Trials for a Clever Demonstration? Pp. 67-74
Maurizio Bendandi
[Abstract]  [Full Text Article]


Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Review of Current Developments in Stroke Rehabilitation Research Pp. 75-80
Boudewijn Kollen, Gert Kwakkel and Eline Lindeman
[Abstract]  [Full Text Article]


A Review of Methods for Ensuring the Comparability of Comparison Groups in Randomized Clinical Trials Pp. 81-86
Vance W. Berger
[Abstract]  [Full Text Article]




Abstracts

[Back to top]
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Giulio Metro, Giovanna Finocchiaro, Luca Toschi, Stefania Bartolini, Elisabetta Magrini, Alessandra Cancellieri, Rocco Trisolini, Luciano Castaldini, Giovanni Tallini, Lucio Crino and Federico Cappuzzo

[Full Text Article]

The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) family, including EGFR, HER2, HER3, and HER4, is implicated in the development and progression of cancer, and is expressed in many human epithelial malignancies, including Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Several molecules were synthesized to inhibit the extracellular domain of EGFR, such as cetuximab (Erbitux), the extracellular domain of HER2, such as trastuzumab (Herceptin) or the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain, such as gefitinib (Iressa) and erlotinib (Tarceva). Gefitinib and erlotinib are orally active, selective EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) that produce objective response rates in about 10% of advanced NSCLC. More recently, erlotinib produced a significant improvement in survival when compared to placebo in pretreated NSCLCs. Among clinical characteristics, although female gender, and adenocarcinoma histology, showed to be significantly associated to TKI sensitivity, never smoking history is probably the most relevant factor. Presence of specific EGFR gene mutations or EGFR gene amplification confer a particularly sensitive phenotype, and patients with activation of the anti-apoptotic protein Akt are more sensitive, when Akt activation is sustained by a EGFR dependent mechanism. Cetuximab is a human-murine chimeric anti-EGFR IgG monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity in tumor cell lines expressing EGFR. It has shown impressive activity when combined with radiation by increasing the antitumor effect of radiation therapy. Cetuximab has a synergistic effect with cisplatin and may play a role in reversing resistance to chemotherapy. Cetuximab demonstrated to be active in pretreated NSCLCs, and its activity as first-line therapy in combination with chemotherapy is currently under evaluation. Efforts should be made for the identification of biological mechanism underlying cetuximab sensitivity and emerging data suggest that the drugs is more active in patients with EGFR gene amplification. In NSCLC, trastuzumab produced disappointing results when combined with chemotherapy, but probably patients were not properly selected. Recent findings in gefitinib treated patients support HER2 analysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization as a complementary test for selection of patient candidate for EGFR targeted therapies. Combination of EGFR targeting agents with other biological drugs is under investigation.


[Back to top]
Recent Clinical Trials of Cladribine in Hematological Malignancies and Autoimmune Disorders
Tadeusz Robak, Agnieszka Wierzbowska and Ewa Robak

[Full Text Article]

The purine nucleoside analog – cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine, 2-CdA) is a cytotoxic agent with high activity in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. It is also an effective drug in some autoimmune disorders. 2-CdA is usually administered intravenously in continuous or 2-hour infusion. Recently however, new formulation of this agent has been developed for subcutaneous and oral administration. 2-CdA is widely established as first line standard treatment for hairy cell leukemia. Moreover several clinical trials have demonstrated that this agent, used alone or in combination with other cytotoxic drugs, showed good efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia. Moreover, some studies indicate that 2-CdA has some activity in progressive multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders including autoimmune hemolytic anemia, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis and in patients with refractory factor VIII inhibitors. This review article will summarize the results of recent clinical trials with 2-CdA in hematological malignancies, multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases.


[Back to top]
Medical Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
Gaetano Apice, Amalia Milano, Giovanni Salvatore Bruni, Rosario Vincenzo Iaffaioli and Francesco Caponigro

[Full Text Article]

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, and it is characterized by the occurrence, in > 90 % of cases, of a gain of function mutation in the c-kit proto-oncogene. STI-571 (imatinib mesylate), a selective KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has changed the natural history of this disease, since it has shown high effectiveness in metastatic GIST, and it is currently under investigation also in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. Mechanisms of resistance to imatinib mesylate include both de novo, and, more frequently, acquired resistance, which may occur after several months of drug administration and possibly depends, in most cases, upon an acquired second mutation. In order to overcome imatinib mesylate resistance, the addition of other drugs may be considered in patients who have less than an optimal response to imatinib mesylate monotherapy. Investigational agents that are being studied in this setting include the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor RAD 001 and the protein kinase C inhibitor PKC412. In addition, other KIT tyrosine kinase inhibitors with anti–VEGF receptor inhibitory activity, such as SU11248, PTK787/ZK787 and AMG 706, are currently being explored as second line monotherapy for imatinib mesylate–resistant GIST. Finally, another new drug, ecteinascidin (ET-743), that blocks cell cycle progression in G2/M phase through a p53–independent apoptotic mechanism, has shown important preclinical and clinical activity against a number of human solid tumors, including GIST.


[Back to top]
Combined Modality Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme: The Role of Temozolomide
Carsten Nieder, Markus Adam and Anca L. Grosu

[Full Text Article]

Despite of improvements in the biological and molecular characterization of glioblastoma multiforme and studies of factors associated with tumor growth and progression, this type of malignant astroglial brain tumor is still difficult to treat. The present article reviews established and emerging prognostic and predictive factors and their potential influence on future therapeutic efforts. Recent developments in standard treatment options (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) are summarized. The integration of the oral cytotoxic agent temozolomide into current treatment protocols of postoperative combination therapy with radiation and drugs is discussed, especially in the context of the recently published randomized trial of the EORTC/NCIC, which showed that radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide significantly improved progression-free and overall survival over radiotherapy alone. The study also provided hypotheses about the subgroups, which are most likely to benefit from this reasonably well tolerated regimen. In a subset of patients, investigation of MGMT promoter methylation in tumor tissue was performed. Survival was shorter in patients with unmethylated promoter in both study groups. Patients with methylated promoter treated with radiotherapy had a median survival of 15 months, those treated with radiation plus temozolomide of 22 months (p=0.007). In the unmethylated group, the difference in median survival was only 1 month (p=0.06). Especially for these patients, alternative treatments need to be developed. The optimum schedule of temozolomide administration and the influence of combinations with additional antineoplastic agents remains to be studied. Early results of clinical trials addressing these issues are presented.


[Back to top]
Topical Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: Current and Evolving Therapies
Jeffrey M. Weinberg

[Full Text Article]

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are evolving malignant cutaneous neoplasms. They are also known as solar keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma in situ—solar keratotic type, or keratinocytic intraepidermal neoplasia. Actinic keratoses can be treated by two general methods: by physical/destructive methods and with topical therapies. This article will review current and evolving topical therapeutic options for AKs. Several topical treatment options have been shown to offer some significant benefit in the alleviation of these lesions. The therapies include 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, diclofenac, colchicine and retinoids.


[Back to top]
The Development of Future Research Strategies from Reviewing Antiemetic Trials for Chemotherapy Induced Emesis
Ian N. Olver

[Full Text Article]

In reviewing the latest trials of antiemetic usage to prevent cytotoxic chemotherapy induced emesis, gaps in the literature suggest directions for future research and identify methodological approaches to be used in future investigations. The usage of molecular techniques and the identification of new receptors may allow new antiemetics to be developed and identification of the genes coding for antiemetic receptors may be used to select the appropriate antiemetics for individuals. Given the success achieved in controlling post chemotherapy vomiting, future studies should focus upon the control of nausea, and measure the impact of antiemetic control on quality of life as well as evaluating the pharmacoeconomics of these agents. Accounting for the interaction of antiemetics with cytotoxics becomes more important in trial design with the increasing complexity of antiemetic regimens. More information is needed on the emetic potential of the various combination chemotherapy regimens, multiple day chemotherapy and chemotherapy over multiple cycles. The emetic potential of prolonged administration of oral chemotherapy and newer biologicals and targeted therapies needs to be recorded. Further studies are required in specialized areas such as with high dose chemotherapy, for radiation induced emesis and in pediatrics.


[Back to top]
Clinical Benefit of Idiotype Vaccines: Too Many Trials for a Clever Demonstration?
Maurizio Bendandi

[Full Text Article]

The most accepted and least biased manner to demonstrate clinical benefit for any new treatment is to show that it conveys a survival advantage in a well-designed phase III, randomized clinical trial. However, in selected cases, an exception can be made to this sound rule.

This review aims at elucidating one such example. In particular, I intend to show that when an individualized form of immunotherapy like idiotypic vaccination, which by definition is completely inactive against any tumor cells, is applied to cancer patients with indolent follicular lymphoma, a carefully crafted phase II clinical trial may be able to demonstrate clinical benefit better and more rapidly than a phase III alternative.

This consideration might be rather important over the next two to three years, since the results of as many as three ongoing phase III clinical trials on idiotype vaccines are expected to be unveiled within this time frame, following the release of conclusive data of our phase II clinical trial, which is imminent.


[Back to top]
Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Review of Current Developments in Stroke Rehabilitation Research
Boudewijn Kollen, Gert Kwakkel and Eline Lindeman

[Full Text Article]

This review article discusses current research developments in functional recovery after stroke. With the institutionalization of stroke services across health care facilities, a reduction in mortality rates, length of inpatient stay and improved independence in activities of daily living has been reported. Several systematic reviews show that traditional treatment approaches induce improvements that are confined to impairment level only and do not generalize to a functional improvement level. More recently developed treatment strategies that incorporate compensation strategies with a strong emphasis on functional training, may hold the key to optimal stroke rehabilitation. Intensity and task-specific exercise therapy are important components of such an approach. Guidelines may assist the clinician in this responsibility. However, due to marked heterogeneity of the stroke population and poor methodological quality of many studies, results are uncertain. Several options are discussed to overcome the problem of stroke heterogeneity in research designs.

Longitudinal repeated measurements designs are required to study the effects of non-linearity and time dependency of functional recovery in stroke. Furthermore, prognostic research based on sound clinimetric data generates relevant information that may guide the clinician in clinical decision making and in determining optimal treatment strategies.


[Back to top]
A Review of Methods for Ensuring the Comparability of Comparison Groups in Randomized Clinical Trials
Vance W. Berger

[Full Text Article]

While different design features of medical studies ostensibly serve different functions, many fall under the umbrella of methods aimed at ensuring the comparability of the comparison groups. Randomization rightly occupies the top spot in the hierarchy of design types, as it eliminates some biases (that is, systematic differences in comparison groups) that no other design can claim to eliminate. It is often assumed, and sometimes even asserted explicitly, that randomization by itself suffices to ensure that the comparison groups are sufficiently comparable that they would differ only randomly, but two points need to be made in this context. First, the assertion is not true. Second, even if it were true, it would still not be a cause for complacency, because even random baseline imbalances can wreak havoc on the valid interpretation of randomized clinical trials. Additional methods, beyond randomization, are therefore seen to be essential to the design of a good randomized clinical trial. Such methods include masking, allocation concealment, restrictions on the randomization, adjustment for prognostic variables, and the intent-to-treat approach to data analysis. Masking aims to ensure that those individuals in any one group formed by randomization are treated as similarly as possible subsequent to randomization as those in any other group formed by randomization. In contrast, allocation concealment and restricted randomization aim to create groups that start off as comparable. Adjustment for prognostic variables aims to change the comparison groups themselves to make them comparable. For example, one might find gender to be both predictive of outcome and unbalanced across treatment groups, and so one would compare the treatment groups not overall but rather first only among females and second only among males. The intent-to-treat approach aims to keep similar groups similar by not allowing for patient selection based on post-randomization outcomes (including failure to comply with the protocol). The key to understanding masking, allocation concealment, and randomization is to recognize that none of them are binary phenomena, even though they are often incorrectly understood to be. So one must question how these methods are actually carried out, rather than contenting oneself with the vague statement that these methods were performed. This review will shed light on the distinction between the process and the outcome of each of these methods (masking, allocation concealment, and randomization), and will also consider issues related to adjustment for prognostic covariates.




Copyright © Bentham Science Publishers Ltd    Terms and Conditions
toptop