|
Current
Pharmaceutical Design
ISSN: 1381-6128

Current Pharmaceutical Design
Volume 15, Number 5, 2009
Contents
Are the Pleiotropic Effects of
Drugs Used for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Clinically
Relevant?
Executive Editors: M. Elisaf and E.N. Liberopoulos

Editorial Pp. 463-466
Statins and Cardiovascular Diseases: From Cholesterol Lowering
to Pleiotropy Pp. 467-478
Q. Zhou and J.K. Liao
[Abstract] [Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199975 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Pleiotropic Effects of Statins - Clinical
Evidence Pp. 479-489
V.G. Athyros, A.I. Kakafika, K. Tziomalos, A. Karagiannis
and D.P. Mikhailidis
[Abstract] [Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199976 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Lipid-Lowering Drugs Acting at the Level of the
Gastrointestinal Tract Pp. 490-516
T.D. Filippatos and D.P. Mikhailidis
[Abstract] [Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199977 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Pleiotropic Effects of Fenofibrate Pp.
517-528
V. Tsimihodimos, E. Liberopoulos and M. Elisaf
[Abstract] [Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199978 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Effects of Thiazolidinediones Beyond Glycaemic Control
Pp. 529-536
R.G. Kalaitzidis, P.A. Sarafidis and G.L. Bakris
[Abstract] [Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199979 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Fibrates and Microvascular Complications in Diabetes
- Insight from the Field Study Pp. 537-552
J.C. Ansquer, C. Foucher, P. Aubonnet and K.L. Malicot
[Abstract] [Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199980 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Pleiotropic Effects of Rimonabant: Clinical Implications
Pp. 553-570
J.-P. Després
[Abstract] [Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199981 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Pleiotropic Effects of Drugs Inhibiting the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone
System Pp. 571-584
P. Jankowski, M.E. Safar and A. Benetos
[Abstract] [Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199982 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Abstracts
[Back to top]
Editorial: Are the Pleiotropic Effects of Drugs Used
for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Clinically Relevant?
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause
of death worldwide. Many drugs are currently used for CVD
prevention. Some of these drugs seem to exhibit effects beyond
their main indication that they are administered for. These
so called ‘pleiotropic’ effects are believed to
contribute to the clinical benefits these drugs offer. Furthermore,
they may differentiate drugs within the same category.
The aim of the present issue of Current Pharmaceutical
Design is to comprehensively review the pleiotropic actions
associated with drugs commonly used for CVD prevention. Authors
are leading experts in their field and they also present their
own research contribution.
Statins are the mainstay of lipid-lowering therapy [1]. Statin
treatment is associated with less CVD evens and deaths both
in primary and secondary prevention [2]. It has been suggested
that the main mechanism by which statins reduce CVD events
is lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)
[3]. Indeed, lowering of LDL-C by other means also leads to
reduced CVD events [4,5]. However, the lag time for these
CVD benefits to become apparent is approximately 5 years when
LDL-C is lowered by non-statin means, but much lower (i.e.
<1 year) when statins are used, for the same degree of
LDL-C lowering [6,7]. Newer statins (such as atorvastatin)
may require only 15 days to differentiate from older statins
(such as pravastatin) in terms of CVD protection in very high-risk
patients [8]. Moreover, statin pretreatment for only 12 hours
before a percutaneous coronary intervention may be associated
with a large reduction of CVD events as compared with placebo
[9]. It is clear that LDL-C lowering itself cannot fully explain
these immediate vascular statin effects. It should be remembered
that mevalonic acid, the product of 3-hydroxyl-3-methylgloutaryl
coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, is the precursor not only
of cholesterol but also of non-steroidal isoprenoid compounds.
These compounds serve as important lipid attachments for intracellular
signaling molecules, such as Rho, Rac and Cdc42 and mediate
a number of adverse vascular and metabolic reactions. Thus,
inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase by statins leads not only
to reduced cholesterol synthesis, but also to a decrease in
these intracellular signaling molecules. It has been suggested
that LDL-C decrease is responsible for the long-term beneficial
effects of statins, while the elimination of isoprenoid compounds
is associated with the immediate vasculoprotective actions
seen with statin treatment. In this issue, Zhou and Liao extensively
review the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for
the cholesterol-independent statin effects [10]. These mainly
include improvement of endothelial function, antiiflammatory
and antioxidant effects as well as normalization of coagulation-fibrinolysis
system [10]. Statins may also decrease blood pressure [11],
have antiarrhythmic properties [12], as well as reduce serum
uric acid levels and improve renal function [13]. In this
issue, Athyros et al. comprehensively review current
evidence from clinical trials regarding the contribution of
these pleiotropic effects to improved clinical outcomes [14].
They conclude that these effects do indeed contribute to the
clinical benefit afforded by statins. The very recently published
Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention
Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) may be relevant in
this context [15]. In JUPITER 17,802 primary prevention subjects
with LDL-C <130 mg/dL but elevated levels of high sensitivity
C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (>2 mg/L) were randomly assigned
to either placebo or rosuvastatin 20 mg/day. LDL-C and hsCRP
levels were reduced by 50% and 37%, respectively, in the active
treatment group. The trial was prematurely stopped after only
1.9 years due to impressive reductions in CVD events (by 44%,
p<0.00001) and all-cause death (20%, p=0.02). Which is
the relative contribution of LDL-C and hsCRP reduction to
this clinical benefit remains to be determined.
A common strategy for augmenting LDL-C lowering is the addition
of a drug that blocks intestinal cholesterol absorption to
current statin treatment. The most commonly used drug in this
setting is ezetimibe, the addition of which offers incremental
LDL-C lowering [16]. Other options include bile acid sequestrants
(BAS), phytosterols and orlistat. Do these agents (especially
ezetimibe) have additional properties except for LDL-C lowering?
Fillipatos and Mikhailidis extensively review current literature
and conclude that these drugs do have cholesterol-independent
effects [17]. Whether these additional actions contribute
to improved clinical outcome remains unknown and is a matter
of controversy. The same holds true for the question whether
similar LDL-C lowering either by high-dose of a statin or
by low-dose of a statin plus ezetimibe leads to the same clinical
benefit [18,19]. Also, is further LDL-C reduction with ezetimibe
clinically meaningful? A recent study, the Effect of Combination
Ezetimibe and High-Dose Simvastatin vs Simvastatin Alone on
the Atherosclerotic Process in Patients with Heterozygous
Familial Hypercholesterolemia (ENHANCE), was the first to
assess the additional clinical benefits of ezetimibe/simvastatin
combination over simvastatin alone in terms of carotid intima
media thickness (CIMT) reduction in patients with familial
hypercholesterolemia [20]. No further benefit in terms of
CIMT reduction by the addition of ezetimibe to high dose simvastatin
treatment was seen, despite the incremental decrease of LDL-C
and hsCRP. However, ENHANCE was only an imaging study and
we have to wait the results of the Examining Outcomes in Subjects
With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Vytorin (Ezetimibe/Simvastatin)
vs Simvastatin (IMPROVE-IT) study which evaluates the clinical
efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg/day compared with
simvastatin 40 mg/day monotherapy in patients (n=18,000) with
acute coronary syndrome [21]. Until the results of ongoing
studies with clinical endpoints are available, the whole dose
range of powerful statins should be used and if treatment
goals are not met, then one should consider the addition of
ezetimibe [22] or a BAS [23].
Fibrates are widely used for the treatment of high triglycerides
and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C).
Fibrates have been associated with CVD reduction, especially
when used in individuals with atherogenic dyslipidaemia. The
most commonly used fibrate is fenofibrate. Tsimihodimos et
al. review current evidence for the existence of pleiotropic
effects of fenofibrate [24]. They show that fenofibrate may
improve endothelial function, exhibit antioxidant and antiinflammatory
properties, attenuate thrombotic process, ameliorate insulin
resistance, and, unique among all fibrates, decrease serum
uric acid levels [24]. Are these effects of fenofibrate clinically
useful? In the Fenofibrate Intervention in Event Lowering
in Diabetes (FIELD) study fenofibrate treatment, although
not successful in reducing the primary end-point of CVD death
or non-fatal myocardial infarction, demonstrated a significant
30% reduction in the need for laser therapy in patients with
and without known diabetic retinopathy [25]. In addition,
fenofibrate treatment was associated with less albuminuria
progression and reduced risk of non traumatic amputations
[26]. An indepth insight into these effects is provided by
Ansquer et al. in this issue [27]. It is possible
that the pleiotropic effects of fenofibrate are useful in
reducing the microvascular complications of diabetes.
A drug class used for diabetes treatment is the glitazones,
which serve as ligands for the gamma peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptors (PPAR γ).
Glitazones (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) improve insulin
resistance and reduce blood glucose levels. Data from human
studies supports the concept that thiazolidinediones exert
several other beneficial metabolic and vascular effects, in
addition to glycaemic control, including improvement in lipid
profile, blood pressure lowering, redistribution of body fat
away from the central compartment, improvement in endothelial
function as well as anti-inflammatory effects, such as reduction
in hsCRP, decrease in microalbuminuria and amelioration of
subclinical vascular inflammation [28]. Conversely, thiazolidinediones
have well-established side effects, most important of which
are fluid retention leading to weight gain and development
of heart failure as well as an increased incidence of bone
fractures [29]. In this issue, Kalaitzidis et al.
shed light into the pleiotropic effects of glitazones [30].
Do these effects play any role in terms of CVD prevention
in diabetics? The answer to this question remains obscure
and may depend on the specific glitazone. Differences in the
pleiotropic effects between the 2 glitazones (especially on
lipid profile) may translate into differences in clinical
benefit. Indeed, there is some evidence that pioglitazone
may reduce CVD events [31], while the effects of rosiglitazone
are either neutral or negative [32]. This is the reason why
rosiglitazone is no longer recommended by the recent consensus
algorithm for diabetes treatment [33].
An underlying feature of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic
syndrome is abdominal obesity, which is strongly associated
with CVD and mortality [34]. Recent research has highlighted
the role of chronic overactivation of the endogenous endocannabinoid
system, acting through its CB1 receptor, as a key factor involved
in the development of abdominal obesity and related cardiometabolic
risk abnormalities such as insulin resistance, low HDL-C,
hypertriglyceridemia, inflammation and low adiponectin. Antagonism
of the endocannabinoid system provides a novel strategy to
target several unaddressed cardio-metabolic risk markers/factors.
Randomized trials of rimonabant (an inhibitor of CB1 receptors)
in patients with overweight or obesity and/or type 2 diabetes
have demonstrated marked and significant improvements in body
weight, waist circumference, glycemic control (in patients
with type 2 diabetes), features of atherogenic dyslipidemia,
insulin resistance, adipose tissue-derived cytokines (leptin
and adiponectin) and hsCRP. Further analyses suggested that
about half of the improvement of several cardiometabolic markers
were independent from concomitant weight loss. Després
critically analyzes these pleiotropic effects of rimonabant
and their importance in clinical practice in this issue [35].
Unfortunately, an excess in psychiatric side effects (especially
depression) associated with rimonabant use led to the recent
decision of European Medicines Agency (EMEA) to suspend this
drug [36].
Drugs inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system
(RAAS) are widely used for hypertension treatment. In addition,
these drugs may offer CVD protection in high-risk patients
independently of the presence of hypertension [37]. Several
pleiotropic effects of these agents have been elucidated.
These include reduction of inflammation, oxidative stress
and vascular remodeling in hypertension beyond blood pressure
reduction. Also, these drugs may prevent onset of new type
2 diabetes [38]. Telmisartan is unique among the other angiotensin
2 receptor blockers in that it partially activates PPAR γ,
thus being associated with further improvements of metabolic
parameters [39]. In the recently published Ongoing Telmisartan
Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global End-point Trial
(ONTARGET) telmisartan was as good as ramipril in reducing
CVD events in high-risk patients [40]. However, their combination
was not associated with any further improvement in CVD risk,
while it was accompanied by an excess of side effects [40].
In this issue, Jankowski et al. review the pleiotropic
effects of RAAS inhibitors and note that some of them may
not be blood pressure-independent [41]. Instead, they state
that there is growing agreement that the relatively greater
influence of agents blocking RAAS on central blood pressure
may at least partly explain their advantages over other antihypertensives
in many clinical situations. Aliskiren is a novel renin inhibitor
which promises to offer improved organ protection by inhibiting
RAAS at its initial step of activation [42]. We have to wait
results of ongoing studies to see whether aliskiren will hold
its promise.
Drugs used for CVD prevention do have pleiotropic effects
that contribute to their clinical benefit. Combination of
these drugs together with intensive lifestyle changes is expected
to substantially decrease the burden of CVD.
References
[1] Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program
(NCEP). Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment
of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel
III) final report. Circulation 2002; 106: 3143-421.
[2] Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, Buck G, Pollicino
C, et al. for the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists'
(CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering
treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants
in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366: 1267-78.
[3] Robinson JG, Smith B, Maheshwari N, Schrott H. Pleiotropic
effects of statins: benefit beyond cholesterol reduction?
A meta-regression analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1855-62.
[4] The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention
Trial results. I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart
disease. JAMA 1984; 251: 351-64.
[5] Buchwald H, Varco RL, Matts JP, Long JM, Fitch LL, Campbell
GS, et al. Effect of partial ileal bypass surgery
on mortality and morbidity from coronary heart disease in
patients with hypercholesterolemia. Report of the Program
on the Surgical Control of the Hyperlipidemias (POSCH). N
Engl J Med 1990; 323: 946-55.
[6] Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford
JD, Cole TG, et al. The effect of pravastatin on
coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with
average cholesterol levels. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1001-9.
[7] Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart
Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin
in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled
trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 7-22.
[8] Ray KK, Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Cairns R, Tonkin AM, Sacks
FM, et al. for the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 Investigators.
Early and late benefits of high-dose atorvastatin in patients
with acute coronary syndromes: results from the PROVE IT-TIMI
22 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1405-10.
[9] Patti G, Pasceri V, Colonna G, Miglionico M, Fischetti
D, Sardella G, et al. Atorvastatin pretreatment improves
outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing
early percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ARMYDA-ACS
randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1272-8.
[10] Zhou Q, Liao JK. Statins and cardiovascular diseases:
from cholesterol lowering to pleiotropy. Curr Pharm Des 2009;
15(5): 467-78.
[11] Milionis HJ, Liberopoulos EN, Achimastos A, Elisaf MS,
Mikhailidis DP. Statins: another class of antihypertensive
agents? J Hum Hypertens 2006; 20: 320-35.
[12] Kostapanos MS, Liberopoulos EN, Goudevenos JA, Mikhailidis
DP, Elisaf MS. Do statins have an antiarrhythmic activity?
Cardiovasc Res 2007; 75: 10-20.
[13] Athyros VG, Mikhailidis DP, Liberopoulos EN, Kakafika
AI, Karagiannis A, Papageorgiou AA, et al. Effect
of statin treatment on renal function and serum uric acid
levels and their relation to vascular events in patients with
coronary heart disease and metabolic syndrome: a subgroup
analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease
Evaluation (GREACE) study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22:
118-27.
[14] Athyros VG, Kakafika AI, Tziomalos K, Karagiannis A,
Mikhailidis DP. Pleiotropic effects of statins-clinical evidence.
Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15(5): 479-89.
[15] Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM
Jr, Kastelein JJ, et al. for the the JUPITER Study
Group. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and
women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 2008;
359: 2195-207.
[16] Mikhailidis DP, Sibbring GC, Ballantyne CM, Davies GM,
Catapano AL. Meta-analysis of the cholesterol-lowering effect
of ezetimibe added to ongoing statin therapy. Curr Med Res
Opin 2007; 23: 2009-26.
[17] Filippatos TD, Mikhalidis DP. Lipid-lowering drugs acting
at the level of gastrointestinal tract. Curr Pharm Des 2009;
15(5): 490-516.
[18] Landmesser U, Bahlmann F, Mueller M, Spiekermann S, Kirchhoff
N, Schulz S, et al. Simvastatin versus ezetimibe:
pleiotropic and lipid-lowering effects on endothelial function
in humans. Circulation 2005; 111: 2356-63.
[19] Settergren M, Böhm F, Rydén L, Pernow J.
Cholesterol lowering is more important than pleiotropic effects
of statins for endothelial function in patients with dysglycaemia
and coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1711-3.
[20] Kastelein JJ, Akdim F, Stroes ES, Zwinderman AH, Bots
ML, Stalenhoef AF, et al. for the ENHANCE Investigators.
Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia.
N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1431-43.
[21] Cannon CP, Giugliano RP, Blazing MA, Harrington RA, Peterson
JL, McCrary Sisk C, et al. for the IMPROVE-IT Investigators.
Rationale and design of IMPROVE-IT (IMProved Reduction of
Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial): Comparison
of ezetimbe/simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy on
cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Am Heart J 2008; 156: 826-32.
[22] Liberopoulos EN, Rizos CV, Elisaf MS. Should we abandon
ezetimibe? CML-Cardiology 2008; 27: 77-89.
[23] Florentin M, Liberopoulos EN, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf
MS. Colesevelam hydrochloride in clinical practice: a new
approach in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. Curr Med
Res Opin 2008; 24: 995-1009.
[24] Tsimihodimos V, Liberopoulos E, Elisaf M. Pleiotropic
effects of fenofibrate. Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15(5): 517-28.
[25] Keech AC, Mitchell P, Summanen PA, O’Day JO, Davis
TME, Moffitt MS et al. Effect of fenofibrate on the
need for laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy (FIELD study):
a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007; 370: 1687-97.
[26] The FIELD Study Investigators. Effects of long-term fenofibrate
therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type
2 diabetes mellitus (The FIELD study): randomised controlled
trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1849-61.
[27] Ansquer JC, Foucher C, Aubonnet P, Le Malicot K. Fibrates
and microvascular complications in diabetes-insight from the
FIELD study. Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15(5): 537-52.
[28] Rizos CV, Liberopoulos EN, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf MS.
Pleiotropic effects of thiazolidinediones. Expert Opin Pharmacother
2008; 9: 1087-108.
[29] Rizos CV, Elisaf MS, Mikhailidis DP, Liberopoulos EN.
How safe is the use of thiazolidinediones in clinical practice?
Expert Opin Drug Saf 2009; in press.
[30] Kalaitzidis RG, Sarafidis PA, Bakris GL. Effects of thiazolidinediones
beyond glycaemic control. Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15(5): 529-36.
[31] Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ, Erdmann E, Massi-Benedetti
M, Moules IK, et al. for the PROactive investigators.
Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with
type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone
Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled
trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1279-89.
[32] Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk
of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes.
N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2457-71.
[33] Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Ferrannini E, Holman
RR, Sherwin R, et al. Medical management of hyperglycemia
in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation
and adjustment of therapy. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 1-11.
[34] Pischon T, Boeing H, Hoffmann K, Bergmann M, Schulze
MB, Overvad K, et al. General and abdominal adiposity
and risk of death in Europe. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2105-20.
[35] Després J-P. Pleiotropic effects of rimonabant:
clinical implications. Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15(5): 553-70.
[36] Press Release - The European Medicines Agency recommends
suspension of the marketing authorisation of Acomplia. Available
at http://www.emea.europa.eu/
[Last assessed October 29, 2008].
[37] Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais
G for the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators.
Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril,
on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med
2000; 342: 145-53.
[38] Liberopoulos EN, Tsouli S, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf MS.
Preventing type 2 diabetes in high risk patients: An overview
of lifestyle and pharmacological measures. Curr Drug Targets
2006; 7: 211-28.
[39] Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP, Athyros VG, Kakafika AI,
Tziomalos K, Liberopoulos EN, et al. The role of
renin-angiotensin system inhibition in the treatment of hypertension
in metabolic syndrome: are all the angiotensin receptor blockers
equal? Expert Opin Ther Targets 2007; 11: 191-205.
[40] Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, Dyal L, Copland I, Schumacher
H, et al. for the ONTARGET Investigators. Telmisartan,
ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events.
N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1547-59.
[41] Jankowski P, Safar ME, Benetos A. Pleiotropic effects
of drugs inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15(5): 571-84.
[42] Brown MJ. Aliskiren. Circulation 2008; 118: 773-784.
Moses Elisaf
Evangelos N. Liberopoulos
Department of Internal Medicine
Medical School, University of Ioannina
451 10 Ioannina
Greece
Tel: +302651097509
Fax: +302651097016
E-mail: egepi@cc.uoi.gr;
vaglimp@yahoo.com
[Back to top]
[Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199975 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Statins and Cardiovascular Diseases: From Cholesterol Lowering
to Pleiotropy
Q. Zhou and J.K. Liao
Statins are 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme
A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, which are prescribed extensively
for cholesterol lowering in the primary and secondary prevention
of cardiovascular disease. Recent compelling evidence suggests
that the beneficial effects of statins may not only be due
to their cholesterol lowering effects, but also, to their
cholesterol-independent or pleiotropic effects. Through these
so-called pleiotropic effects, statins are directly involved
in restoring or improving endothelial function, attenuating
vascular remodeling, inhibiting vascular inflammatory response,
and perhaps, stabilizing atherosclerotic plaques. These cholesterol-independent
effects of statins are predominantly due to their ability
to inhibit isoprenoid synthesis, the products of which are
important lipid attachments for intracellular signaling molecules,
such as Rho, Rac and Cdc42. In particular, inhibition of Rho
and its downstream target, Rho-associated coiled-coil containing
protein kinase (ROCK), has emerged as the principle mechanisms
underlying the pleiotropic effects of statins. This review
provides an update of statin-mediated vascular effects beyond
cholesterol lowering and highlights recent findings from bench
to bedside to support the concept of statin pleiotropy.
[Back to top]
[Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199976 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Pleiotropic Effects of Statins - Clinical Evidence
V.G. Athyros, A.I. Kakafika, K. Tziomalos, A. Karagiannis
and D.P. Mikhailidis
The present review considers the potential pleiotropic
effects of statins and the evidence indicative of the “real
world” benefit from these effects in patients with cardiovascular
disease (CVD). Some of these cholesterol-independent effects
of statins involve improved endothelial function, stability
of atherosclerotic plaques, attenuation of oxidative stress
and inflammation, as well as inhibition of the thrombogenic
response. Clinical evidence from early statin administration
in acute coronary syndromes and in revascularisation procedures
is reported. Moreover, the “metabolic” effects
of statin treatment, such as renal function improvement and
reduction in serum uric acid levels, in patients with stable
coronary heart disease are discussed.
Evidence suggests that in high CVD risk patient groups pleiotropic
effects of statins may play a role in the reduction of morbidity
and mortality. However, this concept requires proof in appropriately
designed trials that will include clinically relevant end
points in order to set specific targets in new CVD-related
biomarkers, in addition to lipid levels, that should be used
to fully assess the statin contribution to CVD treatment.
[Back to top]
[Purchase
Article]
[PMID: 19199977 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Lipid-Lowering Drugs Acting at the Level of the Gastrointestinal
Tract
T.D. Filippatos and D.P. Mikhailidis
This review considers the hypolipidaemic drugs that act
on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. We searched PubMed up
to April 2008 and included randomized controlled trials, original
papers, review articles and case reports. Bile acid sequestrants
(BAS) have a well-established low density lipoprotein cholesterol
(LDL-C) lowering effect, but may increase triglyceride (TG)
levels. BAS have no systematic adverse effects, but are associated
with increased GI adverse effects and interactions with the
absorption of other drugs. Ezetimibe improves LDL-C, high
density lipoprotein cholesterol and TG levels, as monotherapy
or especially when given with a statin. Ezetimibe has not
been associated with serious adverse ef-fects. Ezetimibe has
not been evaluated in large clinical trials with cardiovascular
disease (CVD) endpoints. Phytosterols are not licensed drugs;
they have a well-established LDL-C lowering effect, but there
are no large long-term randomized clinical trials investigating
their effects on CVD events. Orlistat is an antiobesity drug
with a small additional LDL-C lowering effect independent
of weight loss. Orlistat-assisted weight loss improves the
overall lipid profile, carbohydrate metabolism and transaminase
activities. However, its use should be limited to weight reduction.
This drug is associated with increased GI adverse effects.
[Back to top]
[Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199978 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Pleiotropic Effects of Fenofibrate
V. Tsimihodimos, E. Liberopoulos and M. Elisaf
Fenofibrate represents the most commonly used fibric
acid derivative. The drug exerts its metabolic effects by
modulating the expression of several genes involved in lipoprotein
metabolism. In addition, numerous studies suggest that fenofibrate
may also affect the progression of the atherosclerotic process
by several lipid-independent mechanisms. This review considers
the clinical pharmacology of fenofibrate and the current evidence
on the pleiotropic effects of this fibric acid derivative.
[Back to top] [Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199979 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Effects of Thiazolidinediones Beyond Glycaemic Control
R.G. Kalaitzidis, P.A. Sarafidis and G.L. Bakris
The incidence of type 2 diabetes continues to increase
in the western world over the past decade. Consequently, complications
of this disease have reached crisis proportions. In addition
to the classical oral hypoglycaemic agents, i.e. sulfonylureas,
newer classes have emerged that work by different mechanisms
such as insulin sensitizers. One such class are the thiazolidinediones
(rosiglitazone and pioglitazone). These agents act as ligands
for the gamma peroxisome prolif-erator-activated receptors
(PPARs) and result in a lower glucose. Data from animal and
human studies supports the concept that thiazolidinediones
exert several other beneficial metabolic and vascular effects,
in addition to glycaemic control, including improvement in
lipid profile, blood pressure lowering, redistribution of
body fat away from the central compartment, anti-inflammatory
effects such as reduction in hs-CRP and microalbuminuria as
well as subclinical vascular inflammation, improvement in
endothelial function. Conversely, thiazolidinediones have
well-established side effects, most important of which are
fluid retention leading to weight gain and development of
heart failure as well as an increased incidence of bone fractures.
Moreover, evidence from clinical trials suggests that these
agents do not reduce cardiovascular risk. This article discusses
the pleiotropic effects of thiazolidinediones focusing on
clinical cardiovascular outcomes as well as other potential
therapeutic uses in the context of their side-effect profile.
[Back to top]
[Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199980 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Fibrates and Microvascular Complications in Diabetes - Insight
from the Field Study
J.C. Ansquer, C. Foucher, P. Aubonnet and K.L. Malicot
Fibrates are widely prescribed lipid-lowering drug in
the treatment of dyslipidemia. Their main clinical effects,
mediated by peroxisome proliferative activated receptor (PPAR)
alpha activation, are a moderate reduction in total cholesterol
and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, a
marked reduction in triglycerides (TG) and an increase in
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), usually dependent
of their baseline levels and dyslipidemia type. A beneficial
effect on cardiovascular outcomes but also on inflammatory
and thrombogenesis pathways as well as antioxidant properties
have been evidenced conferring other pleiotropic effects to
fibrates. Diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy and neu-ropathy
are the major microvascular complications of Type 2 diabetes
mellitus (T2DM) and their presence can accentuate the risk
of cardiovascular disease. Hyperglycemia, hypertension, genetic
susceptibility among other risk factors play a significant
role in the development and progression of these complications.
Plasma lipid abnormalities are also involved in the pathogenesis
of microvascular diseases suggesting a potential benefit of
lipid lowering drugs in their prevention. Clofibrate was the
first fibrate in the 60’s to show an improvement in
the retinal hard exudation in subjects with diabetic retinopathy.
Recently, in the Fenofibrate Intervention in Event Lowering
in Diabetes (FIELD) study fenofibrate treatment demonstrated
a significant 30% reduction in the need for laser therapy
in patients with and without known diabetic reti-nopathy,
and more particularly in the first course of laser treatment
for both macular edema and proliferative retinopathy. In addition,
fenofibrate treatment was associated with less albuminuria
progression and reduced risk of non traumatic dis-tal amputations.
These results, along with previous evidence of positive effects
on microvascular complications, suggest that fibrates, and
particularly fenofibrate, offer good opportunity to prevent
the most serious complications of diabetes.
[Back to top]
[Purchase
Article] [PMID: 19199981 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Pleiotropic Effects of Rimonabant: Clinical Implications
J.-P. Després
Abdominal obesity (high waist circumference) is more
strongly associated with cardiovascular disease and type 2
diabetes than generalized adiposity (high body mass index).
Recent research has highlighted the role of chronic overactivation
of the endogenous endocannabinoid system, acting through its
CB1 receptor,
as a key factor involved in the development of abdominal obesity
and related cardiometabolic risk abnormalities such as insulin
resistance, low HDL-cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia, inflammation
and low adiponectin. Evidence suggests that these cardiometabolic
risk factors/markers are not optimally managed by current
treatments. Improving the nutrition and physical activity/exercise
habits of patients remains the cornerstone of management of
elevated global cardiometabolic risk. Antagonism of the endocannabinoid
system provides a novel strategy to target several unaddressed
cardiometabolic risk markers/factors. Ran-domized trials of
rimonabant in patients with overweight or obesity and/or type
2 diabetes have demonstrated marked and significant improvements
in body weight, waist circumference, glycemic control (in
patients with type 2 diabetes), features of atherogenic dyslipidemia,
insulin resistance, adipose tissue-derived cytokines (leptin
and adiponectin) and C-reactive protein (a marker of systemic
inflammation). Further analyses suggested that about half
of the improvements of several cardiometabolic risk markers
were independent from concomitant weight loss. Blood pressure
also improved with rimonabant treatment, this effect being
consistent with the blood pressure lowering effect of weight
loss. The tolerability and safety of rimonabant have been
extensively studied and most transient side effects include
some gastrointestinal side effects, anxiety, mood changes
and incidence of depressive disorders, particularly in patients
with previous history of depression. Rimonabant is a useful
option for patients with abdominal obesity and with related
cardiometabolic risk abnormalities such as an atherogenic
dyslipidemia and/or type 2 diabetes.
[Back to top]
[Purchase
Article]
[PMID: 19199982 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Pleiotropic Effects of Drugs Inhibiting the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone
System
P. Jankowski, M.E. Safar and A. Benetos
The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade is
a key component in the modern management of cardiovascular
diseases. Agents that interfere with the different components
of this system such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors,
sartans and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists represent
valuable therapeutic tools to reduce cardiovascular risk in
brachial blood pressure independent mechanisms. Indeed, antagonists
of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system reduce inflammation,
oxidative stress and vascular remodeling in hypertension beyond
blood pressure reduction and have demonstrated better cardiovascular
protection compared with some of the other antihypertensive
agents, especially in selected populations such as patients
with diabetes and renal failure. These advantages were confirmed
recently in several large-scale randomized trials. Latest
evidence suggests that the effect of some antihypertensive
drugs on central blood pressure is greater when compared with
the effect on peripheral pressure. Nowadays, there is growing
agreement that relatively greater influence of agents blocking
reninangiotensin system on central blood pressure may at least
partly explain their advantages over other antihypertensives
in many clinical situations. Clinical consequences of overestimation
of the antihypertensive effect of some drug classes and underestimation
blood pressure changes in patients treated with angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitors when analyzing brachial instead
of central blood pressure is being increasingly recognized
recently.
|