Tubulin
Microtubules as a Target for Anti-Cancer
Agents
Mechanism of Action of Antitumor Drugs that Interact with Microtubules
and Tubulin Pp-1-17
M. A.
Jordan
[Abstract]
Antimitotic Peptides and Depsipeptides Pp-19-53
Ernest
Hamel and David G. Covell
[Abstract]
Novel Aspects of Natural and Modified Vinca Alkaloids Pp-55-70
Alain
Duflos, Anna Kruczynski and Jean-Marc
Barret
[Abstract]
Drugs that Inhibit Tubulin Polymerization: The Particular Case of
Podophyllotoxin and Analogues Pp-71-90
Stéphanie
Desbène and Sylviane
Giorgi-Renault
[Abstract]
The Solid State, Solution and Tubulin-Bound Conformations of Agents
that Promote Microtubule Stabilization Pp-91-122
Jesús
Jiménez-Barbero, Francisco Amat-Guerri, and James P. Snyder
[Abstract]
The Biology and Medicinal Chemistry of Epothilones Pp-123-148
M.
Wartmann and K.-H. Altmann
[Abstract]
[Back to top] [Purchase Issue/Articles]
Mechanism of Action of Antitumor Drugs that Interact
with Microtubules and Tubulin
M. A.
Jordan
Microtubules,
major structural components in cells, are the target of a large and diverse
group of natural product anticancer drugs. Given the success of this class of
drugs in cancer treatment, it can be argued that microtubules represent the
single best cancer target identified to date. Microtubules are highly dynamic
assemblies of the protein tubulin. They readily polymerize and depolymerize in
cells, and they undergo two interesting kinds of dynamics called dynamic
instability and treadmilling. These dynamic behaviors are crucial to mitosis,
the process of chromosomal division to form new cells. Microtubule dynamics are
highly regulated during the cell cycle by endogenous cellular regulators. In
addition, many antitumor drugs and natural compounds alter the polymerization
dynamics of microtubules, blocking mitosis, and consequently, inducing cell
death by apoptosis. These drugs include several that inhibit microtubule
polymerization at high drug concentrations, namely, the Vinca alkaloids,
cryptophycins, halichondrins, estramustine, and colchicine. Another group of
these compounds stimulates microtubule polymerization and stabilizes
microtubules at high concentrations. These include Taxol™, Taxotere™,
eleutherobins, epothilones, laulimalide, sarcodictyins, and discodermolide.
Importantly, considerable evidence indicates that, at lower concentrations,
these drugs have a common mechanism of action; they suppress the dynamics of
microtubules without appreciably changing the mass of microtubules in the cell.
The drugs bind to diverse sites on tubulin and at different positions within
the microtubule, and they have diverse effects on microtubule dynamics.
However, by their common mechanism of suppression microtubule dynamics, they
all block mitosis at the metaphase/anaphase transition, and induce cell death.
[Back to top] [Purchase Issue/Articles]
Antimitotic Peptides and Depsipeptides
Ernest
Hamel and David G. Covell
Tubulin
is the target for an ever increasing number of unusual peptides and
depsipeptides that were originally isolated from a wide variety of organisms.
Since tubulin is the major component of cellular microtubules, which maintain
cell shape in interphase and form the mitotic spindle, most of these compounds
are highly toxic to mammalian cells. These peptides and depsipeptides disrupt
cellular microtubules and prevent formation of a functional spindle, resulting
in the accumulation of cultured cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle
through specific inhibition of mitosis. At the biochemical level, the compounds
all inhibit the assembly of tubulin into polymer and, in the cases where it has
been studied, strongly suppress microtubule dynamics at low concentrations. In
most cases the peptides and depsipeptides inhibit the binding of vinblastine
and vincristine to tubulin in a noncompetitive manner, inhibit
tubulin-dependent GTP hydrolysis, and interfere with nucleotide turnover at the
exchangeable GTP site on b-tubulin.
Most of the peptides and depsipeptides induce tubulin to form oligomers of
aberrant morphology, including tubulin rings that vary in diameter depending on
the (depsi) peptide under study. The purpose of this review is to give an
overview of the cellular, biochemical, in vivo, and SAR aspects of this group
of compounds. We also summarize initial efforts by computer modeling to
decipher a pharmacophore among the diverse structures of these peptides and
depsipeptides.
[Back to top] [Purchase Issue/Articles]
Novel Aspects of Natural and Modified Vinca Alkaloids
Alain
Duflos, Anna Kruczynski and Jean-Marc
Barret
The
clinical interest of Vinca alkaloids was clearly identified as early as 1965
and so this class of compounds has been used as anticancer agents for more than
30 years. Today, two natural compounds, vinblastine and vincristine and two semi-synthetic
derivatives, vindesine and vinorelbine, have been registered and thus Vinca
alkaloids can be considered to represent a chemical class of definite utility
in cancer chemotherapy. Today, relatively few groups actively research in the
chemistry of Vinca alkaloids. However, using superacidic chemistry, a new
family of such compounds was synthesised and vinflunine, a difluorinated
derivative, was selected for clinical testing. A consideration of the
pharmacological data relating to these new derivatives appears to reveal a lack
of any marked correlation between in vitro and in vivo results. Furthermore,
structure/activity relationships have failed to assist the chemist in the
rational design. Such rational design of new derivatives is limited by the fact
that the Vinca binding site(s) on tubulin and the exact mechanism(s) of action
of Vinca alkaloids remain unclear. Nevertheless, the preclinical evaluations of
the new derivative vinflunine have already suggested that certain in vitro
assays, in addition to in vivo experiments, could be proposed to select more
rationally newer generation Vincas. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated
that certain newly identified properties, such as antiangiogenic activities,
could enlarge the therapeutic usage of natural and semi-synthetic Vinca
alkaloids. Thus, Vinca alkaloids remain a drug family with a continuing
interest for future anticancer therapy.
[Back to top] [Purchase Issue/Articles]
Drugs
that Inhibit Tubulin Polymerization: The Particular Case of Podophyllotoxin
and Analogues
Stéphanie
Desbène and Sylviane
Giorgi-Renault
Tubulin being a major cellular target for antitumor drugs, tubulin-interacting compounds have attracted great attention as antimitotic agents. Two main classes of antimitotic drugs are known and one of them includes podophyllotoxin, a natural product. The clinical use of podophyllotoxin in the treatment of cancer has been limited by severe toxic side effects. In an attempt to find less toxic analogues, many podophyllotoxin derivatives have been prepared. Identification of two types of mechanisms of action has led to the development of two groups of podophyllotoxin analogues: tubulin polymerisation inhibitors and topoisomerase II inhibitors. The present article focuses on the first group of podophyllotoxin analogues i.e. those that retain “podophyllotoxin-like” activity. The review starts with a short summary of the structural characteristics of tubulin and its interactions with drugs that affect the microtubule dynamics and then deals with the particular case of podophyllotoxin. Particular attention is given to the nature and the location of the binding sites compared to those of colchicine. The main purpose of the present review being the search for structure-activity relationships, the structural significant features required for antitubulin activity are described and discussed in details.
[Back to top] [Purchase Issue/Articles]
The Solid State, Solution and
Tubulin-Bound Conformations of Agents that Promote Microtubule Stabilization
Jesús
Jiménez-Barbero, Francisco Amat-Guerri, and James P. Snyder
Taxol (paclitaxel), a complex diterpene obtained from Taxus brevifolia and its semisynthetic analogue Taxotere are two of the most important new drugs for cancer chemotherapy. Their mechanism of cytotoxic action involves stabilization of microtubules leading to mitotic arrest. A similar mechanism has been proposed for an expanding set of other natural products, for instance, the epothilones, eleutherobin, the sarcodictyins, discodermolide, laulimalide, Rhazinilam, WS9885B, certain steroids and a group of polyisoprenyl benzophenones.
In
this review, we focus on the conformations of small molecule microtubule (MT)
stabilizing compounds which have been isolated or synthesized and subjected to
structural analysis. NMR and fluorescense spectroscopies, X-ray
crystallography, high resolution microscopy (electron crystallography) and
theoretical calculations comprise the most common methods used in this context.
In particular, we describe how the structures were determined and with what
accuracy. We also discuss the conformational diversity apparent from the three
dimensional structures and compare the various proposals for bioactive
conformations at the target MT binding sites. Of critical importance are the
recently disclosed models for Taxol and its biomimetics binding to b-tubulin. Several different conformational
schemes derived from both pharmacophore construction and modeled protein ligand
complexes are compared and critically evaluated. Although full consensus has
yet to be reached, emphasis is placed on pharmacophore models for the various
anti-MT agents that are internally consistent and encompass more than one
structural class.
[Back to top] [Purchase Issue/Articles]
The Biology and Medicinal Chemistry of Epothilones
M.
Wartmann and K.-H. Altmann
Epothilones
are naturally occurring 16-membered macrolides with the ability to promote
tubulin polymerization in vitro and to stabilize preformed microtubules against
Ca2+-
or cold-induced depolymerization. At the cellular level, interference with
microtubule functionality results in potent inhibition of cancer cell
proliferation at nM to even sub-nM concentrations. Most significantly,
epothilones, unlike paclitaxel (Taxol®), are equally active against
drug-sensitive and multidrug-resistant cell lines in vitro and epothilone B has
also shown potent in vivo antitumor activity in Taxol®-resistant
human tumor models. Epothilone B is currently undergoing Novartis-sponsored
Phase II clinical trials. In addition to naturally occurring epothilones,
numerous synthetic and semi-synthetic analogs have been prepared since the
absolute stereochemistry of epothilone B was first disclosed in mid-1996 and
their in vitro biological activity has been determined. These studies have
generated a wealth of SAR data in a remarkably short period of time, given the complexity
of the synthetic targets pursued. One of these analogs, BMS-247550, is
presently in Phase II clinical trials by Bristol-Myers Squibb. In a first part
this review is intended to provide a summary of the basic features of the in
vitro biological profile of epothilones A and B, including emerging data on
potential cellular epothilone resistance mechanisms. The second and third part
will feature a comprehensive discussion of the epothilone SAR as it has emerged
from the work of various (industrial and academic) laboratories across the
world, including our own, with regard to effects on tubulin polymerization, in
vitro antiproliferative activity, and in vivo antitumor activity.