|
CNS
& Neurological Disorders -Drug Targets
ISSN: 1871-5273
CNS & Neurological Disorders
- Drug Targets
Volume 8, Number 1, March 2009
Contents
Active and Passive Aβ-Immunotherapy:
Preclinical and Clinical Studies and Future Directions: Part
I
Guest Editors: Michael G. Agadjanyan and
David H. Cribbs
Editorial
Pp. 1-6
The Role of Microglia in Antibody-Mediated Clearance of Amyloid-Beta
from the Brain Pp. 7-15
D. Morgan
[Abstract] [Full
Text Article] [PMID:
19275633 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Clearance of Amyloid-β
Peptide Across the Blood-Brain Barrier: Implication for Therapies
in Alzheimer’s Disease Pp. 16-30
R. Deane, R.D. Bell, A. Sagare and
B.V. Zlokovic
[Abstract] [Full
Text Article] [PMID:
19275634 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Quantitative and Mechanistic Studies
of Aβ
Immunotherapy Pp. 31-49
T.E. Golde, P. Das and Y. Levites
[Abstract] [Full
Text Article] [PMID:
19275635 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Immunotherapy, Vascular Pathology, and
Microhemorrhages in Transgenic Mice Pp.
50-64
D.M. Wilcock and C.A. Colton
[Abstract] [Full
Text Article] [PMID:
19275636 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Targeting Generation of Antibodies Specific
to Conformational Epitopes of Amyloid β-Derived
Neurotoxins Pp. 65-81
M.P. Lambert, P.T. Velasco, K.L. Viola and
W.L. Klein
[Abstract] [Full
Text Article] [PMID:
19275637 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Abstracts

[Back to top]
Editorial:
[Back to top]
[PMID:
19275633 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
The Role of Microglia in Antibody-Mediated Clearance of
Amyloid-Beta from the Brain
D. Morgan
[Full
Text Article]
Immunotherapy has emerged as a leading new approach to
the reduction of amyloid deposits in the brains of Alzheimer
patients. At least 4 distinct actions of anti-Aß
antibodies have been proposed as contributing to the inhibition
of amyloid deposition and its clearance. Critically, each
of these proposed mechanisms may be acting simultaneously,
and it is feasible that different antibodies may utilize each
mechanism to a different extent. One of these proposed mechanisms
involves the activation of microglia and the phagocytosis
of Aß
peptide. In general this is assumed to proceed through the
Fcγ-receptor
binding by antibody opsonized Aß
aggregates, however modifying the microglial phenotype into
one with a greater propensity for phagocytosing Aß
is also feasible, as microglia avidly phagocytose Aß
in vitro without antibody present. Evidence is presented
supporting arguments that microglial activation does play
a role in amyloid removal, particularly compacted amyloid
deposits, under certain conditions. In addition to the specific
antibody used, other considerations in comparing different
reports of antibody action in APP mice include the age of
the mice, the extent of pre-existing amyloid when therapy
is initiated, the time point when the effects of the therapy
are examined and the route of antibody administration. Future
questions will consider the source of the activated microglia
near the plaques after antibody administration (resident or
peripheral) and the extent to which shifts in the microglial
phenotype mediate some of the amyloid lowering actions of
immunotherapy.
[Back to top] [PMID:
19275634 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Clearance of Amyloid-β
Peptide Across the Blood-Brain Barrier: Implication for Therapies
in Alzheimer’s Disease
R. Deane, R.D. Bell, A. Sagare and
B.V. Zlokovic
[Full
Text Article]
The main receptors for amyloid-beta peptide (Aβ)
transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) from brain
to blood and blood to brain are low-density lipoprotein receptor
related protein-1 (LRP1) and receptor for advanced glycation
end products (RAGE), respectively. In normal human plasma
a soluble form of LRP1 (sLRP1) is a major endogenous brain
Aβ
‘sinker’ that sequesters some 70 to 90 % of plasma
Aβ
peptides. In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the levels of
sLRP1 and its capacity to bind Aβ
are reduced which increases free Aβ
fraction in plasma. This in turn may increase brain Aβ
burden through decreased Aβ
efflux and/or increased Aβ
influx across the BBB. In Aβ
immunotherapy, anti-Aβ
antibody sequestration of plasma Aβ
enhances the peripheral Aβ
‘sink action’. However, in contrast to endogenous
sLRP1 which does not penetrate the BBB, some anti-Aβ
antibodies may slowly enter the brain which reduces the effectiveness
of their sink action and may contribute to neuroinflammation
and intracerebral hemorrhage. Anti-Aβ
anti-body/Aβ
immune complexes are rapidly cleared from brain to blood via
FcRn (neonatal Fc receptor) across the BBB. In a mouse model
of AD, restoring plasma sLRP1 with recombinant LRP-IV cluster
reduces brain Aβ
burden and improves functional changes in cerebral blood flow
(CBF) and behavioral responses, without causing neuroinflammation
and/or hemorrhage. The C-terminal sequence of Aβ
is required for its direct interaction with sLRP and LRP-IV
cluster which is completely blocked by the receptor-associated
protein (RAP) that does not directly bind Aβ.
Therapies to increase LRP1 expression or reduce RAGE activity
at the BBB and/or restore the peripheral Aβ
‘sink’ action, hold potential to reduce brain
Aβ
and inflammation, and improve CBF and functional recovery
in AD models, and by extension in AD patients.
[Back to top] [PMID:
19275635 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Quantitative and Mechanistic Studies of Aβ
Immunotherapy
T.E. Golde, P. Das and Y. Levites
[Full
Text Article]
There is substantial and compelling evidence that aggregation
and accumulation of amyloid β
protein (Aβ)
plays a pivotal role in the development of Alzheimer’s
disease (AD); thus, numerous strategies to prevent Aβ
aggregation and accumulation or to facilitate removal of preexisting
deposits of Aβ
are being evaluated as ways to treat or prevent AD [1, 2].
Pre-clinical studies in mice demonstrate the therapeutic potential
of altering Aβ
deposition by inducing a humoral immune response to fibrillar
Aβ42
(fAβ42)
or passively administering anti-Aβ
antibodies (Abs) [3, 4], and both passive and active anti-Aβ
immunotherapeutic approaches are now being tested in humans.
Although a variety of mechanisms have been postulated regarding
how Aβ
immunotherapy might work to attenuate or in some circumstances
clear Aβ
from the brain, no mechanism has been definitively proven
or disproven. Herein, we will review the various mechanisms
that have been postulated. In addition we will discuss how
a more thorough understanding of the pharmacokinetics of anti-Aβ
Abs and their effects on Aβ
levels and turnover provides insight into both the therapeutic
potential and limitation of Aβ
immunotherapy. We will conclude with a discussion of additional
experimentation required to better understand the mechanism
of action of anti-Aβ
Abs in AD and optimize antibody (Ab) mediated therapy for
AD.
[Back to top] [PMID:
19275636 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Immunotherapy, Vascular Pathology, and Microhemorrhages in
Transgenic Mice
D.M. Wilcock and C.A. Colton
[Full
Text Article]
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive, neurodegenerative
disorder that results in severe cognitive decline. Amyloid
plaques are a principal pathology found in AD and are composed
of aggregated amyloid-beta (Aß)
peptides. According to the amyloid hypothesis, Aß
peptides initiate the other pathologies characteristic for
AD including cognitive deficits. Immunotherapy against Aß
is a potential therapeutic for the treatment of humans with
AD. While anti-Aß
immunotherapy has been shown to reduce amyloid burden in both
mouse models and in humans, immunotherapy also exacerbates
vascular pathologies. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), that
is, the accumulation of amyloid in the cerebrovasculature,
is increased with immunotherapy in humans with AD and in mouse
models of amyloid deposition. CAA persists in the brains of
clinical trial patients that show removal of parenchymal amyloid.
Mouse model studies also show that immunotherapy results in
multiple small bleeds in the brain, termed microhemorrhages.
The neurovascular unit is a term used to describe the cerebrovasculature
and its associated cells-astrocytes, neurons, pericytes and
microglia. CAA affects brain perfusion and there is now evidence
that the neurovascular unit is affected in AD when CAA is
present. Understanding the type of damage to the neurovascular
unit caused by CAA in AD and the underlying cause of microhemorrhage
after immunotherapy is essential to the success of therapeutic
vaccines as a treatment for AD.
[Back to top]
[PMID:
19275637 PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Targeting Generation of Antibodies Specific to Conformational
Epitopes of Amyloid β-Derived
Neurotoxins
M.P. Lambert, P.T. Velasco, K.L. Viola and
W.L. Klein
[Full
Text Article]
Individuals with early Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
suffer from a selective and profound failure to form new memories.
A novel molecular mechanism with implications for therapeutics
and diagnostics is now emerging in which the specificity of
AD for memory derives from disruption of plasticity at synapses
targeted by toxic Aβ
oligomers (also known as ADDLs). ADDLs accumulate in AD brain
and constitute long-lived alternatives to the disease-defining
Aβ
fibrils deposited in amyloid plaques. The AD-like cellular
pathologies induced by ADDLs suggest their impact could provide
a unifying mechanism for AD pathogenesis, explaining why early
stage disease is specific for memory and accounting for major
facets of AD neuropathology. Discovery of these new toxins
has provided an appealing target for disease-modifying immunotherapy.
For optimal protection against these toxins, antibodies should
bind to the pathological oligomers without being depleted
by their monomeric subunits, which are rapidly generated by
membrane protein turnover. A solution to this problem is likely
to come from the continued development of conformation-specific
antibodies, as described here. Prototype conformation-specific
antibodies, not yet in the clinic, have been introduced and
utilized in multiple applications for their ability to bind
with high specificity and affinity to ADDLs. It can be anticipated
that further development of such antibodies for use in clinical
trials will come in the near future.
|