

1).
How to Efficiently Include Receptor Flexibility
During Computational Docking Pp. 143-153
Andreas May, Florian Sieker and Martin Zacharias,
2008, Vol: 4(2)
[Abstract] |
2).
Predictive QSAR Models for Polyspecific Drug Targets:
The Importance of Feature Selection Pp. 91-110
M.A. Demel, Andres G.K. Janecek, Khac-Minh Thai,
Gerhard F. Ecker and Wilfried N. Gansterer, 2008,
Vol: 4(2)
[Abstract] |
3).
How to Measure the Similarity Between Protein Ligand-Binding
Sites? Pp. 209-220
Esther Kellenberger, Claire Schalon and Didier Rognan,
2008, Vol: 4(3)
[Abstract] |
4).
Docking and High Throughput Docking: Successes and the
Challenge of Protein Flexibility Pp. 221-234
Claudio N. Cavasotto and Narender Singh, 2008,
Vol: 4(3)
[Abstract] |
5).
Quantitative Sequence-Activity Model (QSAM): Applying
QSAR Strategy to Model and Predict Bioactivity and Function
of Peptides, Proteins and Nucleic Acids Pp.
311-321
Peng Zhou, Feifei Tian, Yuqian Wu, Zhiliang Li and
Zhicai Shang, 2008, Vol: 4(4)
[Abstract] |
6).
Visualization of the Chemical Space in Drug Discovery
Pp. 322-333
Jose L. Medina-Franco, Karina Martínez-Mayorga,
Marc A. Giulianotti, Richard A. Houghten and Clemencia
Pinilla, 2008, Vol: 4(4)
[Abstract] |
7).
Novel Quantitative Structure-Activity Studies of HIV-1
Protease Inhibitors of the Cyclic Urea Type Using Descriptors
Derived from Molecular Dynamics and Molecular Orbital
Calculations Pp. 38-55
Tatsusada Yoshida, Toshio Fujita and Hiroshi Chuman,
2009, Vol: 5(1)
[Abstract] |
8). Multimode Methods Applied on MIA Descriptors in
QSAR Pp. 273-282
Matheus P. Freitas, Elaine F.F. da Cunha, Teodorico
C. Ramalho and Mohammad Goodarzi, 2008, Vol: 4(4)
[Abstract] |
9).
Ligand-Based Approaches in Virtual Screening
Pp. 180-190
Dominique Douguet, 2008, Vol: 4(3)
[Abstract] |
10).
ISIDA - Platform for Virtual Screening Based on Fragment
and Pharmacophoric Descriptors Pp. 191-198
Alexandre Varnek, Denis Fourches, Dragos Horvath,
Olga Klimchuk, Cedric Gaudin, Philippe Vayer, Vitaly
Solov’ev, Frank Hoonakker, Igor V. Tetko and Gilles
Marcou, 2008, Vol: 4(3)
[Abstract] |
Abstracts

[Back
to top]
How to Efficiently
Include Receptor Flexibility During Computational Docking
Andreas May, Florian Sieker and Martin Zacharias
Target-based drug design uses available 3D structural information
of receptor molecules to either dock putative ligand molecules
to receptor binding sites or to de-novo design new ligands.
In many cases accurate prediction of putative binding geometries
requires the appropriate inclusion of conformational flexibility
of both the ligand as well as the receptor structure. The
problem of appropriate treatment of conformational flexibility
during docking is also tightly connected to the improvement
of scoring a docked ligand-receptor complex. Highly accurate
scoring of a ligand placement is only possible if the complex
geometry has been predicted with high precision. Considerable
progress has already been achieved in modeling the conformational
flexibility of small organic ligands during docking. Although
of similar importance, receptor flexibility has not been tackled
satisfactorily despite the steady increase in computational
power. Especially during virtual screening of large drug-like
compound libraries the target structure often is still kept
rigid. However, many protein structures undergo local structural
changes (side chain or loop motions) as well as global changes
in the backbone geometry upon complex formation. In recent
years, several promising approaches to efficiently tackle
receptor flexibility have been introduced ranging from conformational
ensemble methods to explicit inclusion of the most relevant
receptor degrees of freedom. Possible applications and future
directions on improving flexible docking approaches will be
discussed.
[Back to top]
Predictive QSAR Models for Polyspecific
Drug Targets: The Importance of Feature Selection
M.A. Demel, Andres G.K. Janecek, Khac-Minh Thai, Gerhard
F. Ecker and Wilfried N. Gansterer
Since the advent of QSAR (quantitative structure activity
relationship) modeling quantitative representations of molecular
structures are encoded in terms of information-preserving
descriptor values. Nowadays, a nearly infinite variety of
potential descriptors is available and descriptor selection
is no longer a task which can be done manually. There is an
increasing need for automation in order to reduce the dimensionality
of the descriptor space. Classical feature selection (FS)
and dimensionality reduction (DR) methods like principal component
analysis, which relies on the selection of those descriptors
that contribute most to the variance of a data set, often
fail in providing the best classification result. More sophisticated
methods like genetic algorithms, self-organizing-maps and
stepwise linear discriminant analysis have proven to be useful
techniques in the process of selecting descriptors with a
significant discriminative power. The topic FS and DR becomes
even more important when predictive models are approached
which should describe the QSAR of highly promiscuous target
proteins. The ABC-transporter family, the cardiac hERG-potassium
channel, and the hepatic cytochrom-P450-family are classical
representatives of such poly-specific proteins. In this case
the interaction pattern is a rather complex one and thus the
selection of the most predictive descriptors needs advanced
methods. This review surveys FS and DR methods that have recently
been successfully applied to classify ligands of poly-specific
target proteins.
[Back to top]
How to Measure the Similarity Between
Protein Ligand-Binding Sites?
Esther Kellenberger, Claire Schalon and Didier Rognan
Quantification of local similarity between protein 3D structures
is a promising tool in computer-aided drug design and prediction
of biological function. Over the last ten years, several computational
methods were proposed, mostly based on geometrical comparisons.
This review summarizes the recent literature and gives an
overview of available programs. A particular interest is given
to the underlying methodologies. Our analysis points out strengths
and weaknesses of the various approaches. If all described
methods work relatively well when two binding sites obviously
resemble each other, scoring potential solutions remains a
difficult issue, especially if the similarity is low. The
other challenging question is the protein flexibility, which
is indeed difficult to evaluate from a static representation.
Last, most of recently developed techniques are fast and can
be applied to large amounts of data. Examples were carefully
chosen to illustrate the wide applicability domain of the
most popular methods: detection of common structural motifs,
identification of secondary targets for a drug-like compound,
comparison of binding sites across a functional family, comparison
of homology models, database screening.
[Back to top]
Docking and High Throughput Docking:
Successes and the Challenge of Protein Flexibility
Claudio N. Cavasotto and Narender Singh
Protein structure-based approaches in lead optimization and
in silico screening of chemical libraries based on
ligand docking have increasingly become part of many drug
discovery projects, mainly due to the technical improvements
in crystallography, the support of modern software, and the
ever increasing computational power. The use of three-dimensional
structural information of therapeutic targets has long been
recognized to initiate and accelerate many drug design programs
in the past, since it offers the possibility of finding novel
scaffolds, different from the existing active compounds. In
spite of its many successes, structure-based virtual screening
or high throughput docking still has several limitations at
the methodological level, not the least of which is protein
flexibility, ignored by most of the docking programs, which
treat the receptor as a rigid entity. This may impact the
accuracy of virtual screening at the docking and at the scoring
level. The authors will first present the latest successful
stories in high throughput docking. After reviewing the concepts
of protein dynamics and binding, and its impact in ligand
docking, the current approaches to incorporate protein mobility
in docking-based virtual screening will be presented and discussed.
[Back to top]
Quantitative Sequence-Activity Model
(QSAM): Applying QSAR Strategy to Model and Predict Bioactivity
and Function of Peptides, Proteins and Nucleic Acids
Peng Zhou, Feifei Tian, Yuqian Wu, Zhiliang Li and Zhicai
Shang
Traditional quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR)
is a term describing a variety of approaches that are of substantial
interest for chemistry. Quantitative sequence-activity model
(QSAM), applying QSAR strategy to explore sequence-activity/function
relationship for biosystems, is greatly meaningful but meanwhile
extremely difficult. For biomolecules, high molecular weight,
diverse structural morphology and intricate interaction network
all bring in traditional QSAR methodologies unprecedented
challenges. This article comprehensively reviewed developing
process, current state and future perspective of QSAM, concerning
its applications into fields of pharmacy, food science, immunology
and molecular biology. Besides, discipline-crossing and amalgamation
of QSAM with QSAR, bioinformatics and computational biology
were also discussed.
[Back to top]
Visualization of the Chemical Space
in Drug Discovery
Jose L. Medina-Franco, Karina Martínez-Mayorga,
Marc A. Giulianotti, Richard A. Houghten and Clemencia Pinilla
Chemical space has become a key concept in drug discovery.
The continued growth in the number of molecules available
raises the question regarding how many compounds may exist
and which ones have the potential to become drugs. Analysis
and visualization of the chemical space covered by public,
commercial, in-house and virtual compound collections have
found multiple applications in diversity analysis, in
silicoproperty profiling, data mining, virtual screening,
library design, prioritization in screening campaigns, and
acquisition of compound collections, among others. This review
covers several techniques, computational programs and approaches
that have been developed to visualize, navigate and study
the chemical space of molecular databases. Techniques developed
in our group are presented including a quantitative assessment
of the multi-fusion similarity maps. Additionally an application
of 3D-similarity, based on the overlay of chemical structures,
to represent the chemical space is introduced. Several comparisons
of the chemical space covered by compound collections from
different sources such as combinatorial libraries, drugs and
natural products, or directed to specific therapeutic areas
are also discussed.
[Back to top]
Novel Quantitative Structure-Activity
Studies of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors of the Cyclic Urea Type
Using Descriptors Derived from Molecular Dynamics and Molecular
Orbital Calculations
Tatsusada Yoshida, Toshio Fujita and Hiroshi Chuman
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease (HIV-1 PR) is
an essential enzyme for the replication cycle of HIV-1. HIV-1
PR inhibitors have been extensively investigated as anti-AIDS
drugs. For developments of HIV-1 PR inhibitors more promising
than those utilized at the moment, the construction of reliable
QSAR models that can elucidate the inhibitory mechanism as
consistently as possible should be one of the most significant
issues. Garg, Kurup, and their groups published comprehensive
QSAR studies using past structure-activity data for HIV-1
PR inhibitors, and summarized some physicochemical structural
factors of inhibitors that govern variations in the inhibitory
activity for various structural types. There seem to exist
much to be clarified further, especially for effects of electronic
structure of inhibitors. It is also expected to incorporate
structural and physicochemical information about the enzyme
protein into the QSAR model. In this article, we reviewed
our own QSAR study on a series of cyclic urea inhibitors with
newly proposed QSAR descriptors. We performed molecular dynamics
simulations of HIV-1 PR-inhibitor complexes to provide the
accurate geometry to the fragment molecular orbital (FMO)
calculations as well as to the estimation of an accessible
surface area descriptor for inhibitors and amino acid residues.
With the FMO procedure to cover full electronic feature of
three-dimensional structure of protease-inhibitor complexes,
we derived electronic descriptors for inhibitors and amino
acid residues. The successful results are believed to provide
a new insight into QSAR and understanding of binding mechanism
of inhibitors with HIV-1 PR at atomic and electronic levels.
[Back to top]
Multimode Methods Applied on MIA Descriptors in QSAR
Matheus P. Freitas, Elaine F.F. da Cunha, Teodorico C.
Ramalho and Mohammad Goodarzi
Since the introduction of physicochemical descriptors to derive
useful QSAR (quantitative structure-activity relationship)
models, some regression methods have been applied to linearly
correlate dependent (bioactivities) and independent variables.
Multiple linear regression (MLR) has been widely used when
the number of samples (rows) exceed the amount of descriptors
(columns), whilst partial least squares (PLS) is the most
commonly applied regression method in 3D QSAR (e.g. CoMFA
and related methods), where a large number of descriptors
are generated. The recently implemented MIA-QSAR (Multivariate
Image Analysis applied to QSAR) method is a especial (not
only) case in which the descriptors (pixels) for each active
compound result in a three-way array after grouping samples
to give a data set. Such array may be properly treated by
using N-way methods, such as multilinear PLS (N-PLS) and parallel
factor analysis (PARAFAC). However, these methods have not
been appropriately explored in QSAR studies, despite their
supposed advantages over well established methods. Thus, this
review formally details the MIA-QSAR approach prior to presenting
two promising multimode methods to be applied on MIA descriptors,
namely N-PLS and PARAFAC. Also, the suitability of such methods
is discussed in terms of application to a case study (a series
of anti-HIV compounds) and comparison to traditional (bilinear)
PLS and docking studies.
[Back to top]
Ligand-Based Approaches in Virtual
Screening
Dominique Douguet
Although there are many more receptor structures than there
were in the 1970s and 1980s, drug discovery remains dominated
by empirical screening and substrate-based drug design. Computer-aided
drug design methods have become value-adding disciplines that
now contribute to the early stage of the drug discovery process
[1, 2]. Computational methods encompass all aspects of drug
discovery from target assessment to lead optimization. The
computational strategy varies from case to case and can be
influenced by several situational variables: lead hunting
or lead optimization, requirement for a novel lead class,
type of biological assay, structural information available,
known classes of ligands, allocated chemistry resources…
Today, drug discovery is still a complex and approximate science.
Thus, incorporating knowledge-based approaches like ligand-based
screenings may bias the process towards success. This review
describes these strategies with practical applications and
presents future perspectives of ligand-based screening.
[Back to top]
ISIDA - Platform for Virtual Screening
Based on Fragment and Pharmacophoric Descriptors
Alexandre Varnek, Denis Fourches, Dragos Horvath, Olga
Klimchuk, Cedric Gaudin, Philippe Vayer, Vitaly Solov’ev,
Frank Hoonakker, Igor V. Tetko and Gilles Marcou
In this paper we illustrate the application of the ISIDA (In
SIlico design and Data
Analysis) software to perform virtual screening
of large databases of compounds and reactions and to assess
some ADME/Tox properties. ISIDA represents an ensemble of
tools allowing users to store, search and analyze the data,
to perform similarity searches in large databases of molecules
and reactions, to build and validate QSAR models, and to generate
and screen virtual combinatorial libraries. It uses its own
descriptors (substructural molecular fragments and fuzzy pharmacophore
triplets). Workflow can be easily organized by combining different
ISIDA modules. Several examples of ISIDA applications (similarity
search of potent benzodiazepine ligands with FPT, QSAR modeling
of aqueous solubility, aquatic toxicity, tissue-air partition
coefficients, anti-HIV activity, and screening of the “Chimiothèque
Nationale” Database), are discussed. Particular attention
is paid to mining reaction databases using Condensed Reaction
Graphs approach.
|